• dogbert@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    125
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lemme know when the administration starts canceling real leftists, not democrat regime propagandists 🥱

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      “I only care when viewpoints I agree with are censored”

      I don’t know if that’s what you meant to say but that’s how it reads

      • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mfer is just like the average MAGA fascist.

        Assuming they’re safe forever when its others targeted

        Won’t realize they fucked up (assuming they’re even mentally capable of self reflection or critical thinking) until its their ass in the camp.

    • beetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s a poem for this. Maybe you should care when anyone is silenced by the govt

    • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      To be fair, regardless of what you think of Kimmel or Colbert - actual leftists don’t have enough of an audience to justify the administration wasting time on them. So they don’t.

      • dogbert@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        3 days ago

        Exactly. You don’t get that level of access unless you are complicit in this system, like Kimmel and Colbert.

        • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean even on ‘alternative media’ there are really not many self-made individual leftists with wide viewership. I suppose my other point is that it is still a problem when the government also tries to censor people who are not leftists.

          • dogbert@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It’s just ironic considering Colbert and Kimmel themselves have censored leftists throughout their careers. They themselves are part of this threat you’re speaking of…

            • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              How did they censor leftists? With the power of the government behind them?

              • dogbert@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Brother, Kimmel had his security assault numerous Pro-Palestine advocates at his show during a Kamala Harris taping…

                Colbert is literally on the DNC payroll. You think that Mamdani interview wasn’t coordinated?

                • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Can I see the context of this assault?

                  Not sure what Colbert being on the DNC payroll or a gotcha interview with Mamdani has to do with censorship.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I bet you don’t care about the immigrants being taken because some of them aren’t politically aligned with you

    • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Are you a ‘real leftist’ who would rather attack liberals for not being not left enough before attacking conservatives?

      Or are you a right wing plant here to sow political division among the American left?

      Horseshoe theory strikes again.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Are you a ‘real leftist’ who would rather attack liberals for not being not left enough before attacking conservatives?

        Yes. That’s what leftists do. Haven’t you been paying attention?

      • dogbert@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        3 days ago

        Liberalism is a conservative ideology. There is no “left enough” as they are not leftists. This is not a secret. Read theory.

        • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Liberalism is a stepping stone to socialism.

          You cannot institute change by expecting people to radically change their ideologies overnight. It happens bit by bit, through actionable steps, not condescension and anger.

          Ask yourself this, do you truly want people to become more progressive, or do you just want to feel morally superior by yelling at people who don’t meet your standards?

          American liberals are just trying to do the bare minimum of fighting fascism, and even that is a monumental task. Political infighting in the American left only helps conservatives. By the time you are done yelling at liberals, there will no longer be a country that has any shot at adopting ‘real leftist’ ideologies.

          • dogbert@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            An ideology that is pro-capitalism cannot be a stepping stone toward socialism. That doesn’t make any sense, and Liberals have literally opposed socialism at every step. Please read theory. This has already been debated and settled a long time ago. Socialism is only achieved by a violent overthrow of the ruling class. A class that liberalism is designed to protect.

            • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s so easy to romanticize the ‘violent overthrow of the ruling class’ as if social collapse doesn’t bring upon starvation, armed conflict, destitution, and mass instability.

              Please stop with the armchair progressivism. The vast majority of American liberals aren’t protecting the ruling class, they’re working three jobs to feed a family for four while people like you treat them like a moral failure for making a realistic attempt against deep rooted conservatism.

              How about you treat liberals like humans who have kids, family, and friends to think about, and not objects of sacrifice in your grandiose ‘theories’ that conveniently leaves out the mass casualties involved in the process?

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They should invite Nick Fuentes on to have him discuss what other right wing heads will be exploded by his basement troll army. Maybe the hosts can explore why the right keeps killing the right.