• King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Youre the one begging them for free content here, stuff costs money get a job bum

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No youtube for you then, being disabled doesnt mean the universe owns you free videos and you can insult others for reminding you that stuff costs money

          Edit money not even required just watch ads, the entitlement jesus

            • King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              says the guy who insults me because he thinks universe owns him free videos for getting him disabled

            • King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah bro just wanted to hear it, u cant help it with some people. " aakshually i cant walk no job for me so give me youtube" then u get called unpleasant for not agreeing

      • drkt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Videos always existed on internet” People upload 500 hours of video to youtube per minute how simpleminded are you Jesus Christ

          • drkt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wow your reading comprehension is astounding, ill try to use as few words as possible, more videos = more money needed to host them

              • drkt
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • BURN@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Storage isn’t cheap

                  Network bandwidth isn’t cheap

                  Data centers aren’t cheap

                  Add on Electricity, Transcoding, Multiple AZs, Backups, cached content with ISPs and engineer salaries and you’ve got a very expensive system.

                  That’s not even factoring in payments to creators, which are necessary if you want people to make quality content for the platform.

                  Your website serves multiple orders of magnitude less traffic than a single YouTube page. Web costs aren’t linear. It’s an S-Curve where it’s incredibly cheap to get started, but gets exponentially more expensive until you’ve reached some level of critical mass where revenue exceeds costs.

                  Video hosting pre-YouTube was terrible. It barely existed, and it wasn’t accessible. They sure didn’t invent it, but they made it possible for the masses to host video.

                  No other web content platform has taken off since YouTube. There’s a reason for that, and the majority is cost. To reach a widespread audience you have to invest hundreds of millions into infrastructure. Same reason Twitch still has the critical mass of livestreamers.

                • King@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I already covered those points in my previous comments: 500 hours uploaded per minute, more videos = more money needed to host them. I can’t dumb it down further, sorry

                  • drkt
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    deleted by creator