Maybe just because he has a software project that interacts with bluesky in a decentralised way so he knows it’s possible? Just because someone disagrees or, in this case, wants to see the same standards applied to other platforms doesn’t mean they’re a paid actor here to disrupt the peace or something.
More likely it the account is behaving in an inauthentic way. It’s possible for Twitter to decentralize one day too, that doesn’t make it real, likely, or feasible. It would be just as strange for someone to openwash Twitter.
except that bluesky already theoretically is, the numbers you quoted just show that most people are tied to one server stack meaning it’s effectively centralised. Thus the question on how decentralised Matrix is.
why else would someone behave in such a shameful and embarassing manner
Maybe just because he has a software project that interacts with bluesky in a decentralised way so he knows it’s possible? Just because someone disagrees or, in this case, wants to see the same standards applied to other platforms doesn’t mean they’re a paid actor here to disrupt the peace or something.
More likely it the account is behaving in an inauthentic way. It’s possible for Twitter to decentralize one day too, that doesn’t make it real, likely, or feasible. It would be just as strange for someone to openwash Twitter.
except that bluesky already theoretically is, the numbers you quoted just show that most people are tied to one server stack meaning it’s effectively centralised. Thus the question on how decentralised Matrix is.
“already theoretically is” is a hilarious way to avoid saying “isn’t”.