So, AI == 0?
AI ==
🖕 🤖
🐛💤👔🐛 ⛽️ 👢 ⚡️ 8=👊=D💦 🎸 🌂 👢 👢AI = sqrt((pc)2 + (m0c2 )2 ) - m0c2
Let’s be real, AI actually costs energy doesn’t it?
only at rest
This has gotta be satire, right?
…right?
With LinkedIn it’s impossible to tell.
Every time I see something this funny on LinkedIn, I remember that it would be an insult to the creative genius of the satirist who wrote it not to laugh react it. Have I laugh reacted something meant seriously? Probably, but it’s for the greater good.
I have had students like this. Have asked me for references and everything.
So, have they been like that before they took your classes?
They seemed normal in class, very keen.
Then it’s dissertation time and they want to build levitating islands to solve global warming and getting into my office when I’m not there to leave weird notes on my monitor complaining that the department isn’t responding to their ‘funding proposal’ emails.
Pretty sure it is. I remember seeing the same post a while ago where someone mentioned it’s a troll account.
I need this to be satire.
Jfc this HAS to be satire. No one is this dumb. Wait yes they are. But still.
He even wrote that with ChatGPT 😭
Needs more em dashes.
Fuck outta here with your — oh wait mine are en dashes carry on
By including AI in the equation, it symbolizes
Fuckin lmao
You’re missing out the best part. In the original post there’s a PHD dude from MIT who just replies with “what”
COUNTLESS sleepless nights
That’s at least 3
It’s a real LI post:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7239360707425697792/
But I just read it and all of the author’s replies to comments and I am still only about 70% sure he’s joking. He must be though, right? He’s an undergrad at Georgia Tech.
this bothers me in so many ways I wasn’t ready for
dude studying neuroscience, yet using less than 3% of the brain
That’s because the rest of the brain is busy proompting LLMs.
His professors should double check his submissions for AI slop.
deleted by creator
If E=mc² and E=mc²+AI, it follows that AI=0. Which is an understatement because it doesn’t just achieve nothing, it achieves regression.
it’s means that either Artificial is zero, or Intelligence is zero (or both). given that we know it’s artificial, it means that it has zero intelligence
Undergraduate
Neuroscience
What gives them any credibility when it comes to computer science? The Dunning-Kruger is strong with this bubble.
Edit: After scrolling through their comment responses and comments under other posts, I’m fairly certain they’re just trolling.
Machine learning models use artificial neurons. “Neuroscience” contains all the letters from “neurons”. “Computer science” is missing an
n.Who’s stupid now?
This is a flawless argument
Should’ve got some sleep so you’re thinking clearly, because that is some empty bullshit.
The AI actually represents the extra energy use caused overcomplicating things by adding the coolest new thing without thinking about what it is and how it might help
The stupid, it burns
