• GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not unlikely the poster is a non native speaker and is used to having a feminine gendered noun for the word person in their native tongue.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        or just likes reminding people in an effective way how strange it is that the “default” pronoun is “he”

        • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Its not any weirder than pretty much any other language. In many Latin languages the default is feminine rather than masculine. Referring to a group of mixed gendered people in Spanish would be default feminine. Theres literally nothing inherently incorrect about either one having a default. I would imagine most native Spanish speakers would view someone as stupid for intentionally making something masculine over feminine just to prove a point of any kind.

          Seeing English having a masculine default is patriarchal in some way is just nonsense. Latin countries are no less patriarchal despite having a completely different kinds of genderization in language. I studied a great deal of feminism and gender theory in college but this is one place where I dont see the logic at all. Overall tho I could care less if people want to write whatever pronoun they want there. To me, having it be gendered is a very outdated method of writing and they sounds far more modern. Saying he or her where you could say they just sounds like old timey Atlantic accent speech

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s kinda weird in general that most languages have gramatical markers for gender.

            We don’t have a separate pronoun and separate word endings for e.g. young vs old, for poor vs rich, for educated vs unlearned and so on.

            Many languages don’t even have a neutral form (like “they” in english), thus forcing you to mark the gender of the person you are talking about gramatically.

            Like, for example, why would I care whether the baker making my bread is male or female? I care that they are a baker and know how to make good bread. Otherwise they don’t even have to be human for all I care.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If they’re not yet enslaved by capitalism, they just might be. (I’m going to put an /s here because intelligence is relative and can’t really be determined by any general rule of thumb without acknowledging context).