And framed it as just a few dozen moderators who protested. Nothing the user polls, etc. He notes that the users have “outsized power” over the site. Bitch, the users are the site.
And seriously in the comments. Lots of people read those, and they can be used to argue against viewpoints in the article, or raise questions that stick around in peoples mind. In election season spending a hour or two a week on a highly commented articles you can make a difference. Don’t see why it wouldn’t work with this kind of pr either.
They sure left out a ton. Nothing about accessibility etc
And framed it as just a few dozen moderators who protested. Nothing the user polls, etc. He notes that the users have “outsized power” over the site. Bitch, the users are the site.
Right? The framing is shite, that’s exactly it. Frustrating.
People who have NYT accounts should post rebuttals adding all the shit they didnt
The mods/users need to write a counter-editorial and petition to get the NYT to publish it.
And seriously in the comments. Lots of people read those, and they can be used to argue against viewpoints in the article, or raise questions that stick around in peoples mind. In election season spending a hour or two a week on a highly commented articles you can make a difference. Don’t see why it wouldn’t work with this kind of pr either.