But no, let’s cut them down to build one more lane, right?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Somebody reported this post for being off-topic, but it’s not.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        oh interesting. This was hard for me to see. I wonder about the car that’s stopped in the road, though. Did he really go measure it?

        Edit: also, the high up on the side of the house

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Spoken by someone who’s never been to a place that doesn’t naturally have trees.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    3 days ago

    Never mind shade, anyone who’s ever ridden a bicycle from the country into an urban area will instantly feel the rise in air temperature. It’s almost unbelievable, like you’ve stepped into a different planet.

    But it’s okay because cars have air conditioning. /s 😒

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      100% agree. Biking in nature feels so much fresher than in the city.

      Cities are a hot oven.

      • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t, but is it more than the diffference between fields and forests? Though forests aren’t just shade, the trees/plants also cool themselves and their surroundings.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It can be more. It can really be like hitting a wall in some cities, suddenly you’re on the shitside, the change is very sudden and very dramatic, lot more than from a field to a forest.

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah its way more. In a field the grass is reflecting alot of the heat, or using the energy for photosynthesis. In a city the asphalt literally works like a pizza oven. All the cement and asphalt absorb all that heat and get heated to insane temperatures, and then radiate that heat outwards all evening/night.

  • Dammam No. 7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    When water shortage is a concern a simple manufactured shade is a sufficient alternative. People can’t be expected to walk when it is over 40C under direct sunlight.

  • Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    I had to cut a major shade tree in my backyard, it was ready to fall over. We replaced it with a sapling and I cannot wait for it to grow up, holy shit my deck gets fucking hot! There’s a couple more that gotta go soon too and I’m very reluctant - expensive to cut down, expensive to replace, especially if they are already tall.

    • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Plant something that grows faster? That won’t last as long, but it should give some shade in the meantime.

      + evaporative cooling

      Edit1: Bonus points for something that would natively grow there, because you have to do less to support them once they’ve grown a bit.

      Edit2: You could decide to not fully get rid of them and instead slowly kill them. Like leaving the trunk and some big branches, cutting the rest off. Cutting off everything green that grows anew. That will still give a little bit of shade. But can also support other plants to give them hold and protect them from wind. Ivy probably can cover it with green. I don’t really know what I’m talking about.

      Edit3: Replace ivy with other native climbing plants if it’s not native in your area etc. (It’s native where I live, but it wouldn’t be native to the Americas for example)

      • Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The sapling is native and will get huge, but its gonna be a few years. Admittedly I got it for free, anything already bigger is quite an expense. Ivy was actually a huge problem, I spent a ton of time and effort cutting it off the trees because it was choking them out and killing them. The trees I still need to get rid of are not native. I was told they will continue to grow until they are too tall to support themselves and fall over. The longer I wait the more expensive it is to cut them down. My best guess is they are 25-30 feet tall already. Shopping for trees even half that size is something I was not prepared for, but I am hoping to figure out soon knowing it needs to happen eventually.

        I spent most my life in the city, so when I bought the property I wanted the mature trees, but was unaware of the problems these particular trees had. I still like this spot but I wish I knew more about what I was getting into. I’m using a pop up tent for cover while I figure out what exactly to do, but the shade it provides is nowhere near as cool as being under the trees.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Plant and groom the new ones early.

      The trick with plants is generally to act like the creepiest villian asshole you can. If you dont emotionally abuse your plants, they’re not gonna be any good.

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Abuse them. Cut them to be more to your liking, starve them of water to get their roots where you want, groom them like you’re Jeffrey Epstein, emotionally abuse them, occasionally waterboard them, torture them with loud music at all times…

          And they will thrive. Its why agricultural societies jumped into depravity faster than their hunter gatherer peers; plants just need abuse.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I struggled with some potted houseplants last year. Come winter, I assumed they’d all died so I just gave up.

            But this spring, one of the plants bounced back stronger than ever. All it took was some tender, loving neglect. It’s still thriving on my porch right now.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 days ago

    Along the same lines are all the parks in my city that cut down large trees to plant small ornamental trees. Oh, want a bench? Nowhere near the trees. Yeah, I’m talking about you, Shoreline park! WTheck

  • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This shows why replacing inner city roads with tree lined avenues makes a difference in city climate.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    does that particular tree make money for some billionaire? if not it is expaendable

  • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Really more than trees, it seems to be an argument for more grass to help reduce temps especially where trees aren’t feasible or will take time to grow

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s primarily an argument to not cut down trees that are already there just so you can build another fucking parking lot or something

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      Concrete surface in contact with direct noon sunlight is always gonna be scorching hot, 50°C is not far fetched. On a super hot day you can cook an egg on concrete. These surface also tend to heat up slow but also lose heat slowly, which is why even after a couple of hour after sun down it will still feel warm to the touch, creating what is known as urban heat trap.

      • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Dr. Hannah Fry made a short video about this recently – this kind of heat retention is why London Underground stations are so bloody hot, because the clay tiles lining the underground tunnels have absorbed heat from trains braking day in and day out and are constantly releasing excess heat into the air at the stations

        • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Interesting. So adding regenerative breaking to the trains would actually reduce the heat.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      The photo seems to suggest he is measuring surface temperatures, so I assume they are real. Doesn’t seem that far fetched.

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Concrete and dark-colored metal surfaces can absolutely reach those temperatures after a few hours of direct sunlight

      • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s still the remains of a burn on the bottom of my foot from when I needed to cross the street to check the mail when I was a kid

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think that’s what the guy kneeling down at the 27,9 C measurement is doing, recording the temperature of that spot.

      My doubt does come in though with the street measurement. The asphalt is cooler than the sidewalk? What? Also, did he go out into the street to take the measurement and then run back? I guess if there were no cars around he could have, but that doesn’t seem like a low-traffic area. Just a few weird things about that one detail.

      • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Asphalt has less heat retention capability than sidewalk bricks. The asphalt is venting more of its heat into the surroundings than the bricks are, which is why it’s cooler.

        There’s also very little traffic on his side of the street – you’ll notice there are almost no cars on that side, so it’s more than likely he had ample time to get a temperature read on the asphalt before a car came along