You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.
But you weren’t calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.
You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.
Stop lying. Using the same car analogy isn’t a copy and paste.
Doing something that sucks more while complaining about those that do things that sucks less is hypocrisy.
You have yet to read my original comment, lmao. Not a surprise, you probably let AI think for you.
This is what I replied to:
“Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument”
Is there something else you are referring to that I missed?
You resort to insults because you have no defense for your argument.
And you replied calling me a hypocrite for liking one thing and disliking the other, despite me saying that both sucked?
“Great argument.” was sarcasm which implies you didn’t believe your earlier statement.
No, it implies it’s a bad defense of AI saying a bad thing isn’t as bad as another bad thing doesn’t negate that the first thing is bad.
Calling out hypocrisy isn’t a claim that one of the two bad things isn’t also bad.
But you weren’t calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.