• jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Seems more like “putting things in scale” than “whataboutism.” I’m not sure I agree with the premise, but I don’t think it’s whataboutism at all. Whataboutism would be “it’s fine, because something else is worse,” whereas I think the commenter is trying to say “it’s not much, since it’s less than something else that isn’t much either.”

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They give analogies elsewhere about buses blowing big fat gas loads in front of SUV drivers, so if this is what they’re doing at all, it’s only because they’re floating between opinions, happily landing on whichever one happens to be more useful.

        I believe they would say both are insignificant—but also!—video games are worse, so… you know, if you think electricity waste is bad, really you’re the problem, hippie.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is it wrong to point out hypocrisy? Is also it wrong to mock SUV owners who complain that buses burn gasoline/diesel?

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Arguments from hypocrisy are lazy jabs made by people too cowardly to take a strong stance on anything. Be affirmative: Do you think buses burn too much gasoline?