I mean, we know they can be used as evidence against you, but what if I was actually just chilling and watching Youtube videos at home? Can my spying piece of shit phone ironically save me? 🤔

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I love this question.

    The police would say, in my opinion, that the phone being somewhere was evidence if they needed it to be and say that it didn’t prove the owner was there if they didn’t want it to be useful.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Do you not understand the concept of a defence attorney? It’s not just the police that decide what is and isn’t evidence.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Does the defense attorney go out to the scene, conduct interviews, photograph items of interest, or secure custody of any evidence gathered?

        It’s the police that decide what is “evidence” and attorneys argue over what they found later. A good attorney might go out and look for some of those things after the fact, but the vast majority will not. You either gather your own evidence or roll the dice with the police actually doing their jobs.

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Are you seriously suggesting a police force will not secure a murder suspect’s phone as part of their enquiries?

          Or that, if they didn’t, this would work against them in court later?

          • kobra@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You act like police never withhold or tamper with evidence. The persons point was that police have an inherent advantage because they get the first look at evidence, for a good long while, until it’s turned over to any defense team.

          • LordGimp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Im suggesting that police will find the evidence that best fits the narrative they’re trying to portray. If the phone helps their case, sure. If it doesn’t, or contains evidence to the contrary, there’s a decent chance it’ll get “accidentally” misplaced if it’s even collected at all. They’re out to prove your guilt, not suggest your innocence.