no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agoLet delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldimagemessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1640arrow-down120
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imageLet delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·12 hours agoYou’re the only person here saying that.
minus-squareChloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-212 hours agoand it’s only you who’s saying that ryedaft was “complaining about a group of people based on sexuality”
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-212 hours agoOh please, it’s clearly obvious there is nothing heteronormative about hetero people using topping to mean something else. Peoples having a different meaning is not the same as enforcing themselves as the default, it’s not even tangentially related.
minus-squareadr1an@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agoFwiw, I’m hetero and having a girl on top feels like they have more, if not all, control. I never subscribed to homosexual dichotomy of tops and bottoms. Long ago, I learnt that there were “active” and “passive” roles. I guess it’s generational. Like “old” terms that sound antique or even “wrong”.
You’re the only person here saying that.
and it’s only you who’s saying that ryedaft was “complaining about a group of people based on sexuality”
Oh please, it’s clearly obvious there is nothing heteronormative about hetero people using topping to mean something else. Peoples having a different meaning is not the same as enforcing themselves as the default, it’s not even tangentially related.
Fwiw, I’m hetero and having a girl on top feels like they have more, if not all, control.
I never subscribed to homosexual dichotomy of tops and bottoms. Long ago, I learnt that there were “active” and “passive” roles.
I guess it’s generational. Like “old” terms that sound antique or even “wrong”.