• Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Thing is that Schrödinger would never put a cat in a box to test his thought experiment because Schrödinger knows that macroscopic objects don’t really adhere to quantum mechanics principles because of decoherence.

    • lenuup@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      He only proposed the cat thing to show how ridiculous it is to apply quantum mechanics to macroscopic objects. Unfortunately the sarcasm was missed and it became the standard example of quantum mechanics.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Rather, it became the standard example of every event that has 2 outcomes, regardless of quantum mechanics is even applicable or not. It was a complete failure.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which was the more important point.

        If the microscopic particle subject to superposition was the catalyst for the cat’s death, then too isn’t the cat’s fate in both realities?

        Of course he was being intentionally absurd

    • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you want collapsing wave functions? Because cats how you get collapsing wave functions.