Even as a work truck it’s comically large. You can get the same amount of cargo space in a far smaller vehicle, this one’s only advantage would be the sheer horsepower which you only need for very specific work.
Those are impractically large or not highway ready for horse trailers and other comparably sized trailers that are used for working. The F250 and 350 sized trucks are for in between light loads and those loads.
Not everything needs to be at the extremes of tiny or semi trailer.
I thought you were talking about massive trailers and not horse trailers. Noone needs a clown car to tow a horse trailer or something comparably sized. Your average station wagon is totally capable of that.
In case you aren’t trolling, I’m talking about horse trailers that anyone familiar with horses would understand.
Also comparable trailers.
None of these should be driven around in a city regularly. These trucks are not made for commuters or small spaces. They are for large farm, construction, and other work that requires more than a light truck but not a semi or tractor. They are comparable to delivery trucks and vans. In fact, large vans are just enclosed versions of the trucks. This was the van version of the F350 of its day.
Sorry I didn’t intend to troll. I’ve never seen one of those things in your picture. I don’t even think they exist in Europe. If you were to transport more than two or three horses here, you’d probably use something like this (but I’m not much of a horse guy so I’m not sure):
For the hay bales, you’d just use your tractor (they can drive as fast as 80km/h nowadays) unless you’re really going for a loooong distance. In that case you’d use some kind of small truck and trailer:
But that’s rarely necessary anyway. Why would I want to deliver hay across the country when the local hay is just the same.
yeah that doesn’t exist in australia either… those trailers probably came after the truck: there’s no need… transport 1-2 horses or rent a commercial company to transport them… nobody is transporting horses that often they need that stupid ass truck to be produced at commercial volumes
Ah yes, two trailers of hay bales is the exact same thing as one trailer!
Why move hay long distances? Well, in rural areas of the US moving hay 200+ miles in open states like Montana or Kansas isn’t really moving it that far and they don’t necessarily grow hay everywhere. Different crops are clustered in different areas because of growing conditions. I don’t think you grasp the scale of plains in the middle of the US.
Look, the US has a lot of open space OUTSIDE OF CITIES where loads less than commercial cargo need to be moved around at highway speeds (75 mph/120kph) for longer distances. Tractors do NOT meet that need, they aren’t fast enough. Large cargo hauling cabs are overkill.
Construction jobs often needs to move around very heavy, but not massively large construction equipment for which heavy cargo haulers would be overkill.
Again, these ‘oversized’ trucks are actually oversized for commuting and light duty use but are appropriately sized for a ton of purposes that fit between a lawn mower business and building a skyscraper. They are being used in the wrong contexts which makes them a problem. Most of Europe is the wrong context in the same way that most US cities are the wrong context unless they are going to or returning from a job site with a load that probably includes a trailer’s worth of materials and equipment.
Demonize them for being used in the wrong context. That doesn’t mean they don’t have a reason to exist in the first place because of some other options that don’t fit the same need.
The big one is a work truck and should not be driven as a commuter. It really shouldn’t be allowed on roads where cargo trucks aren’t allowed.
Even as a work truck it’s comically large. You can get the same amount of cargo space in a far smaller vehicle, this one’s only advantage would be the sheer horsepower which you only need for very specific work.
It is made for towing massive trailers.
It’s made for carrying tiny penisses. Cars that are actually made to tow massive weights look like this
or this
This is a weird argument to put here. You’re actually advocating against the smaller option.
Those are impractically large or not highway ready for horse trailers and other comparably sized trailers that are used for working. The F250 and 350 sized trucks are for in between light loads and those loads.
Not everything needs to be at the extremes of tiny or semi trailer.
I thought you were talking about massive trailers and not horse trailers. Noone needs a clown car to tow a horse trailer or something comparably sized. Your average station wagon is totally capable of that.
In case you aren’t trolling, I’m talking about horse trailers that anyone familiar with horses would understand.
Also comparable trailers.
None of these should be driven around in a city regularly. These trucks are not made for commuters or small spaces. They are for large farm, construction, and other work that requires more than a light truck but not a semi or tractor. They are comparable to delivery trucks and vans. In fact, large vans are just enclosed versions of the trucks. This was the van version of the F350 of its day.
Sorry I didn’t intend to troll. I’ve never seen one of those things in your picture. I don’t even think they exist in Europe. If you were to transport more than two or three horses here, you’d probably use something like this (but I’m not much of a horse guy so I’m not sure):
For the hay bales, you’d just use your tractor (they can drive as fast as 80km/h nowadays) unless you’re really going for a loooong distance. In that case you’d use some kind of small truck and trailer:
But that’s rarely necessary anyway. Why would I want to deliver hay across the country when the local hay is just the same.
yeah that doesn’t exist in australia either… those trailers probably came after the truck: there’s no need… transport 1-2 horses or rent a commercial company to transport them… nobody is transporting horses that often they need that stupid ass truck to be produced at commercial volumes
Texas: nearest town is 200mi away
Ah yes, two trailers of hay bales is the exact same thing as one trailer!
Why move hay long distances? Well, in rural areas of the US moving hay 200+ miles in open states like Montana or Kansas isn’t really moving it that far and they don’t necessarily grow hay everywhere. Different crops are clustered in different areas because of growing conditions. I don’t think you grasp the scale of plains in the middle of the US.
Look, the US has a lot of open space OUTSIDE OF CITIES where loads less than commercial cargo need to be moved around at highway speeds (75 mph/120kph) for longer distances. Tractors do NOT meet that need, they aren’t fast enough. Large cargo hauling cabs are overkill.
Construction jobs often needs to move around very heavy, but not massively large construction equipment for which heavy cargo haulers would be overkill.
Again, these ‘oversized’ trucks are actually oversized for commuting and light duty use but are appropriately sized for a ton of purposes that fit between a lawn mower business and building a skyscraper. They are being used in the wrong contexts which makes them a problem. Most of Europe is the wrong context in the same way that most US cities are the wrong context unless they are going to or returning from a job site with a load that probably includes a trailer’s worth of materials and equipment.
Demonize them for being used in the wrong context. That doesn’t mean they don’t have a reason to exist in the first place because of some other options that don’t fit the same need.
It should require a CDL
Agreed.