• anachrohack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I disagree, I liked harry potter a lot. I think they’re good books. I don’t think we have to pretend like this is about literary taste and not the author’s political views. I think people should be up front with what the real message is: “I think that the authors views are abhorrent and therefore you should not support her financially”. The age appropriateness of the books or their quality is just a disingenuous personal attack on the fans and is just childish

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I stand by my position of the harry potter books being bad, but I will concede on two points:

      1. it’s an opinion not a fact.

      2. it’s not that important to the larger discussion of rowling being a shitty person who’s shittiness shouldn’t be supported.

      I would also like to say that my criticism of the quality of the books is NOT an attack on the fans of the work (at least it’s not when I do it, can’t speak for anyone else). It is ok to like bad writing, it would be hypocritical of me to say otherwise as I do enjoy reading a lot of amateur writing from time to time. To further this point, I’d like to say that there are aspects of rowling’s creation that I actually do like. The setting of the wizarding world is quite interesting, and I’d love to dig through lore regarding the characters and the history and just how the setting got to where it is by the timeframe of the books.

      Actually, speaking of the wizarding world and of crappy amateur writing, I think imma go read Thinking in Little Green Boxes again.