I am looking for a solution for my students who all have Chromebooks (which are locked down).

Their opportunities will be greatly expanded if they had access to Windows-based software (Blender, Unreal Engine, 3D slicing software, etc.,).

I have access to a couple desktop machines that I could host virtual boxes on if there was some way for them to remote into them through a web browser.

Is that something that is possible, and where would I get the information to get started hosting something like that?

If not, are there any alternative solutions that do not require a paid subscription?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I would recommend that you bring in someone with experience instead of trying to wing it. It sounds like you are trying to bypass your IT department which is never a good idea. Talk to the people who control the Chromebooks.

    What you are looking for is virtual desktop. It will cost money but it is worth it in the end. I would highly recommend that you take a look at Azure virtual desktop or related services. It is all cloud based and it is likely what you are after.

    If

  • bmcgonag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If you can get It’s blessing I’d suggest something like KASM workspaces or WebTops, basically a Linux desktop in the browser.

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    if they had access to Windows-based software (Blender, Unreal Engine, 3D slicing software, etc.,).

    All of those applications that you mentioned run on Linux too. Maybe check if everything you want to use runs on Linux and then you don’t need to sell your students’ souls on their behalf.

    • Vegan_Joe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m fine with them accessing either OS. Right now they only have access to a glorified bloated web browser.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Students, as in you’re a teacher? Talk with your school’s IT department first.

    • Mordikan@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, if the student devices are locked down its done so per policy. Creating VMs which allow students to bypass that policy is going to potentially get you into trouble with administration. IT could maybe setup those students with Citrix Workspaces or something similar they support to achieve that without having to throw student restrictions out the window.

    • Vegan_Joe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m in a rural area without much funding. They would likely take issue with me adding complexity to their already overworked schedule.

      Anyway, I’d rather ask forgiveness than for permission in most instances like these.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        That’s a very bad idea

        It will almost certainly blow up in your face and cost more money in the long run. (Time is money)

      • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Please ask for your department’s help before setting up rogue hypervisors on your school’s network. Depending on network security, you might not get far anyway.

  • -> @jrgd@lemmy.zip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    How locked down are the Chromebooks?

    Remote VM seems overkill if you can just enable “Linux for Chromebook”, which gives a sandboxed terminal at which point you can setup and install software like Blender, PrusaSlicer, etc.

    It won’t be the fastest because they are thin clients, but even modern thin clients do decently for ‘light’ work.

    • Vegan_Joe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If only! They cannot be reimaged at all. They cannot even add extensions to Chrome. They are LOCKED down.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        By whom?

        Please talk to your IT department. If nothing else you could get the green light for something else.

      • lorentz@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Linux from chromebook is just a configuration you enable from the settings menu. If offers you a shell which is similar to a Ubuntu and you can install standard Linux software using the “apt install” command. Said so, if they cannot even install chrome extensions this is likely disabled too.

      • paf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does it have access to boot menu? If so, change boot order so it goes to usb first. You will then only need to create a bootable usb stick with Linux on it

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Screenconnect, teamviewer, proxypro, vnc, RDP are all remote access solutions. Some work fine through a browser but work better from a chrome app.

    I wouldn’t virtualize that type of software you listed though, I’d just give them access to the desktop itself.

    • Vegan_Joe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only reason I would virtualize would be to allow multiple users to have access to their own workspaces.

      It would seem safer to have them sandboxed within a virtual workspace than to give them all user accounts synchronously on a desktop, if that’s even possible.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        The apps you list need decent gpu and gpu doesn’t virtualize well. You also don’t run into licensing issues with Windows.

        You can create individual accounts on the desktops so they get their own workspace.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The apps you list need decent gpu and gpu doesn’t virtualize well.

          That’s not really true any more. To actually get it working, especially sharing a GPU between multiple VMs, is finicky, especially if you’re not using the very narrow supported configuration and expensive enterprise hypervisor features. But it is possible, and you can find plenty of articles from people who have gotten it working.

          But I still wouldn’t recommend it. I’d give one whole GPU to one VM with PCI passthrough, and let multiple users remote in. Hopefully the apps support that.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            But I still wouldn’t recommend it. I’d give one whole GPU to one VM with PCI passthrough, and let multiple users remote in.

            Which is why I’ve made the recommendation I did. Skip virtualization and go straight to remote access.

            • jacksilver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Yeah, that would be my recommendation too. Anything else will produce a worse experience (laggy and slow) and more complexity to get setup/maintain.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I would go for something Cloud based like Azure virtual desktop or similar. I don’t think Kasm has a cloud option.

      • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Why?

        There are not benefits in the cloud solution over the hosted server. It could even be more expensive on the long run…

        And yes, kasm has a cloud solution in its web page

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The benefit is that it way easier to manage since you don’t have to worry about physical hardware.

          I get that it could easily be to expensive but it might not be bad with educational discounts.

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whatever way you go for setting up the systems themselves, I’ve found dwservice.net to be perfect for accessing systems with only a browser.

    The host component is Mac, Windows and Linux compatible. The clients need only an account at DW. Hosts tied to your own account can be shared with others.

    Depending on host OS, you get screen, terminal and fire transfer access. Sessions are logged if you need to review who’s accessed what.

    Free. Donation optional.