• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would they grow a spine? The people funding them are the same as those funding the people who are fine with this happening.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      From 2003 to 2010 the DNC managed to heavily restrict campaign finance large sum donations, until the 5 conservative SCOTUS judges overturned it in Citizens United.

      A DNC core platform stance is to undo Citizens United, but it takes 60 senators to update the constitution and there have not been more than 50 in over a decade.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Please they might have that on paper, but I promise you if they had a 60 seat majority, they would find two Democrats to vote with the Republicans to defeat it. Hell you have Republicans in the DNC. That’s right many members with D by their names are secretly Republicans. They are plants. Funny thing is the DNC knows it but doesn’t expell them or call it out.

        So no they don’t want to stop taking the money. They just got rid of Hogg and the guy leading the DNC claimed it was because he was hurting his fundraising.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Call their fucking bet, then? You have a party of absolute corruption and a party that hasn’t had a chance to do the things they say they will, the choice seems really clear to me.

          • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Call their fucking bet, how?

            This is seriously some low effort attempt to cover for democrats or an actual delusion?

            “They’re not doing anything significant, so let’s vote them all in so they can cry and while while doing nothing significant.”

            Actions speak louder than words, popularity stunts are not political actions.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Elect 60 (or more) of them to senate for the first time in over 40 years.

              If they don’t pass their core policies, then there is no party representing the people and the radicals will have the opportunity to become mainstream and tear it down.

              If they do pass campaign finance laws, overturn citizens united, election reform, expand congress, reform the SCOTUS, tax the rich, and public option healthcare or even Medicaid for All: we all win.

              That still isn’t enough to cut off Israel, but certainly lessens their power by gutting AIPAC and substantially lowers their support in Congress compared to before.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Please enlighten us. What does “calling their bet” look like?

            They’re still one of two major parties in a two party system.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Democrats HAVE had a chance to do what they promise. Several times. You have to seriously be completely ignorant to recent history if you think all the Democrats need is a majority…