See if you weren’t being an antagonistic ass the whole time I’d put forth the time and effort to give a response, but you just want to be a dick every other sentence so why bother?
That’s a lot of effort to say no, isn’t it? lol
Feel free to point out where specifically I was ‘being an antagonistic ass’ so that I may better myself and others.
I completely respect you if you find that inconvenience not worth bothering with either.
I wish only peace for you and your loved ones chief!
The thing is, I like having conversations with people in good faith, I’ve learned a lot that way, however to your question.
I understand what you think you’re pointing out
Do you think you could spell out a logic for why I shouldn’t hold this belief?
Preferably without unrelated analogies that distract from a simple coherent argument if possible
These three statements are clearly antagonistic and not seemingly in any form of good faith discussion so, I could reasonably expect similar fun with any further discussion.
I didn’t say you should believe anything, I merely pointed out that the initial statement doesnt add to the conversation and people of course downvoted it. And then explained why the response of “anyone who would downvoted this is just a nazi” is a dumb thing to say lol.
I’m sorry you feel this way. I thought logic was at the core of what was being conversed so I didn’t bother much with appeasing to emotional sensitivities–especially when you opened with ‘logic dictates’ then proceeded to make one of the most blatantly fallacious pseudo-arguments I’ve ever come across.
Then again you’re also doing a lot of bothering to not be bothered with my simple (yet antagonistic) questions as well, so perhaps there’s something to be said about such a state of consistent inner-conflict. I’m obsessed with how people ignore their own faults you could say. Thank you for the help comrade
See if you weren’t being an antagonistic ass the whole time I’d put forth the time and effort to give a response, but you just want to be a dick every other sentence so why bother?
That’s a lot of effort to say no, isn’t it? lol Feel free to point out where specifically I was ‘being an antagonistic ass’ so that I may better myself and others.
I completely respect you if you find that inconvenience not worth bothering with either. I wish only peace for you and your loved ones chief!
The thing is, I like having conversations with people in good faith, I’ve learned a lot that way, however to your question.
I understand what you think you’re pointing out
Do you think you could spell out a logic for why I shouldn’t hold this belief?
Preferably without unrelated analogies that distract from a simple coherent argument if possible
These three statements are clearly antagonistic and not seemingly in any form of good faith discussion so, I could reasonably expect similar fun with any further discussion.
I didn’t say you should believe anything, I merely pointed out that the initial statement doesnt add to the conversation and people of course downvoted it. And then explained why the response of “anyone who would downvoted this is just a nazi” is a dumb thing to say lol.
I’m sorry you feel this way. I thought logic was at the core of what was being conversed so I didn’t bother much with appeasing to emotional sensitivities–especially when you opened with ‘logic dictates’ then proceeded to make one of the most blatantly fallacious pseudo-arguments I’ve ever come across.
Then again you’re also doing a lot of bothering to not be bothered with my simple (yet antagonistic) questions as well, so perhaps there’s something to be said about such a state of consistent inner-conflict. I’m obsessed with how people ignore their own faults you could say. Thank you for the help comrade