I mean, why evolution selected dinosaurs to become that huge?

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that point in Earth’s history, the atmosphere was a lot more oxygen rich than it is now! This allowed all sorts of creatures to grow to immense sizes, like trees, insects and dinosaurs. Dinos like Brontosaurus probably grew large for the same reasons Giraffes did too. The best greenery is the one no one else can get to!

        • MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but what do giraffe women think about it?

          Unless you’re talking about circumference? Then maybe walrus women or elephant seal women should be consulted

      • magikmw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general no traits are selected for by feeding or whatever, if you can produce offsprings you’re it. Sexual attractiveness > easier to get food.

          • magikmw@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why eat when you can just spawn, fuck and die. Like that mouthless butterfly or moth can’t remember.

            • TauZero@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The moth still eats a shitton in its larva stage. You can’t cheat physics 😂.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure you got the oxygen part right. But I can say that since trees and animal breath each others exhaust, they won’t both thrive due to atmospheric oxygen concentration.

  • holycrap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    The vast majority were not! Larger animals are more likely to be fossilized, so our fossil record is biased toward larger animals.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    First, not all dinosaurs were huge. It’s not a trait of dinosaurs in general. Rather, the environmental factors in the past and some factors that are true for reptiles, allowed being huge as an acceptable evolutionary niche, more than today!

    Why would some of them grow so big:

    In evolution, it’s always a bit of a hen and egg problem. And there is between species competition called “Red Queen Hypothesis”.

    So a likely explanation is that, due to high CO2 atmosphere, plants grew larger which lead to having a long neck or being tall being an advantage. And for carnivorous species bigger herbivores meant that being bigger is an advantage. That, again, meant their prey had pressure to grow bigger (and/or faster), and so on and on.

    How could some of them grow that much:

    Dinosaurs are reptiles, so they were poikilothermic. Since temperatures have been higher and more stable at their time, a bigger body allowed to keep body temperature stable as well. It doesn’t cool off as fast which allowed more activity which allowed eating more which allowed a bigger body.

    There was also significantly more oxygen in the atmosphere which is associated with bigger growth in all species since our metabolism depends on it.

    This is especially true for Arthropoda btw, some of them were huge in the time of dinosaurs because they breath through their exosceleton. The biggest centipede found (yet) was 2.5 m long! The difference in size between insects in the past and insects today is much bigger than between reptiles today and in the past. All due to bigger plants and more oxygen and the interaction spiral between prey and predator.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At first I interpreted “huge” as “immensely popular”. I thought you were surrounded by idiots who aren’t impressed by dinosaurs lol

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Being big is advantageous as long as the animal is able to find enough food to sustain itself. Food was plentiful at the time, so dinosaurs grew quite large.

    In modern times, most mega fauna is gone because Humans hunted them to extinction.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even before humans drove them to extinction they were nowhere near dinosaur sized though.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big game hunters driving the giant lemur to extinction bothers me most, I think. I’d love to see a lemur the size of a gorilla.

  • bstix
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They weren’t all big, but anyway, they (probably) evolved like giraffes to reach for food and as protection against physical damage from predators. The climate was also different and they had plenty of food.

    Anyway, evolution does not select. It’s not survival of the coolest features… it’s only reproduction of those that manage to reproduce.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Um, yes, evolution does select. That’s the whole point of evolution.

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It selects the fittest, yes. The comment above you was saying it doesn’t select coolest or specific creatures, just ones most adapted.

      • bstix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is no evolutionary selection. Only creatures fucking. Sometimes it isn’t selective.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hollow bones and in some cases spaces within their bodies that were just filled up with air. The end result being that dinosaurs were a lot lighter than their frame would suggest, which is what allowed them to get so big in volume.