🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 23 hours agoAnon watches a romance moviesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down15
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageAnon watches a romance moviesh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 23 hours agomessage-square99linkfedilink
minus-squareNewDark@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down20·21 hours agoYou might be internalizing those movie scripts and your own lived experience. A cursory Google search indicates the opposite.
minus-squareOutwit1294@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down2·20 hours agoWhat do you mean? I am saying what happens in the movies, the movies which mostly women watch. I didn’t say it was real.
minus-squareNewDark@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down23·20 hours agoSo you meant to say: And most of the time it is women cheating in those movies. Which, fair enough if that’s what you meant.
minus-squareGregorGizeh@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up35·20 hours agoHonestly that seems a little pedantic. I read their comment and understood just fine they were talking about those.
minus-squareNewDark@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down25·20 hours agoI mean, the rest of the comment did not help. It feels like a misogynistic critique of “how women are”. Glad you were able to pick up on that interpretation; but it obviously can be read, you know, the way it is literally written.
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·18 hours agoI mean, you could only read it like that if you ignore the post’s context, as well as the next sentence that clearly talks about the movies.
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·18 hours agoCome on dude, they even specify movies in their reply.
minus-squareOutwit1294@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up20·20 hours agoWe were talking about movies. So yes, I was talking about what happens in movies.
You might be internalizing those movie scripts and your own lived experience. A cursory Google search indicates the opposite.
What do you mean? I am saying what happens in the movies, the movies which mostly women watch. I didn’t say it was real.
So you meant to say:
Which, fair enough if that’s what you meant.
Honestly that seems a little pedantic. I read their comment and understood just fine they were talking about those.
I mean, the rest of the comment did not help. It feels like a misogynistic critique of “how women are”. Glad you were able to pick up on that interpretation; but it obviously can be read, you know, the way it is literally written.
I mean, you could only read it like that if you ignore the post’s context, as well as the next sentence that clearly talks about the movies.
Come on dude, they even specify movies in their reply.
We were talking about movies. So yes, I was talking about what happens in movies.