Authorities have arrested the man suspected of killing of Baltimore tech entrepreneur Pava LaPere, a U.S. Marshal confirmed, as police announced plans to reveal details of the capture following a major manhunt.

Baltimore police said they planned to announce the “arrest of murder suspect Jason Billingsley” in a news conference at 11 a.m. ET Thursday. No further details were released and police did not immediately respond to requests for comment from NBC News early Thursday.

Deputy U.S. Marshal Albert Maresca Jr. confirmed Billingsley’s arrest to Baltimore-based NBC affiliate WBAL-TV. He said the suspect, who is 32, was apprehended at a train station in Bowie, Maryland.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was this random or did he have a motive for killing her?

    • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just his normal behaviour

      Somehow he got let out

      Billingsley pleaded guilty to a first-degree sex offense and was sentenced in 2015 to 30 years in prison, with 16 of those years suspended, court records show. He was paroled in October.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t really answer the question, though. Most violence is done by people who are habitually violent, and most violence is not completely random and committed against strangers.

        Dude is broken, but someone being traumatized and repeating a cycle of aggression and trauma doesn’t actually explain any particular incident they have.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was already wanted for an unrelated rape and murder. She was just the target he selected for the same reason. Maybe he saw her at a coffee shop. Maybe he just saw her on the street.

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I think that was the original question. Is there some sort of relationship that is not being mentioned. We know he has a past and looks like a person that could very well have done this. But why? Is it just some person at the wrong place and wrong time? Or did he know her?

  • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to be far more harsh on crime. Most good natured people aren’t accidentally finding themselves the subject of police intervention.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cite literally anything that says that stricter penalties lead to a decrease in crime. Your intuition is not a valid source.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nations with the strictest drug laws have the fewest users.

        Same with nations that have laws against homosexuality. Fewer people are openly gay in them.

        I know you want to live in your fantasy world where nobody is deterred by punishment, but that’s just not the world we live in.

        It’s sad this needs to be explained to so many of you, but that’s what makes this a microcosm. The majority opinion here is not representative of the world as a whole, and in many times shouldn’t be.

        • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those nations may have people who are better at hiding their drug use or homosexuality, or more people repressing it, but that’s NOT a good thing.

          They’re are crimes worth being more strict about, and crimes that shouldn’t even be crimes.

          I’ll also note that being more strict about a given crime doesn’t necessarily mean just throwing them in a cell and throwing away the key. If the only response you have for someone doing something wrong is punishment, you aren’t actually going to make anything better for anyone.

          Proper, and actually effective policies to deter most crimes (that are actually worth being crimes ) MUST include supporting education, public health, (both physical and mental), economic strength and balance, as well as supporting and rehabilitating those convicted of crimes, and researching the REAL factors that drive crime whether they be economic, environmental, or otherwise. For example, in the years since we stopped using leaded gas in cars, there has been a significant decrease in certain types of violent crime because we’re no longer poisoning our brains with lead. Countries with good sex education and safe, legal abortions also tend to see statistically noticable reductions in crime.

          For example, after Portugal decriminalized drug use, side from the obvious reduction in drug related prison population, drug overdose deaths went down, and remain below EU average. And to this day Portugal has one of the lowest rates of drug use in the EU. So what’s the point of being’strict’ on the crime of drug use???

          Money spent fighting the inequalities and injustices that lead to crimes is far more effective than money spent in punishment.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, just like Florida had the lowest covid rates in the country.

          Oh, but that was because they stopped testing… hmm, but people not openly using drugs in countries that heavily criminalize them surely aren’t just doing them in secret.

          Right?

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uhh, no. You’re trying to use an analogy to distract from the topic at hand. It’s not a 1:1 representation of the situation we’re talking about, but serves as a good tool to debate the accuracy of the analogy instead of the actual subject.

            Do you disagree that: “Nations with the strictest drug laws have the fewest users” or “nations that have laws against homosexuality. Fewer people are openly gay in them.”

            No need to bring florida into this, unless you’re relying on mental gymnastics. Hence my comment about fantasy worlds.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s every reason to bring the Florida example into this, Mr. Debatelord.

              Covid rates went down in Florida because they stopped testing, not because they didn’t have covid.

              Very relevant when trying to suggest that punitive action towards gay people/ drug users result in less of both. The answer is, no they don’t, they just hide. That does not make the punishment “effective”. What you’re saying is like saying that they’re punished so they just magically aren’t gay anymore lmao.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a Target that reported every theft in SF for a month. It doubled the crime stats for the city, so the city told them to stop reporting theft.

  • cricket97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    He doesn’t need prison, he needs rehabilitation. and we need to defund the police. community defense is the best defense!!!

      • DBT@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not enough people are smart enough/ bothered enough to understand what that phrase really means.

        It isn’t that people are “not falling for it,” they just take it at face value and brush it off because they don’t understand it or care.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, prison being for rehabilitation is pretty stupid.

        It also doesn’t make sense to defund the police if you don’t own a gun and can’t fight.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’d rather lock someone up for a few years, make it near impossible for them to get employment upon release and just hope for the best? Or do we bear the expense of tossing away the key or killing them instead?

          As for funding - a cop with a gun is clearly the best option dealing with situations like someone having a mental heath crisis - much safer, cheaper, and freer to shoot them or toss them in prison too! We can’t rest on our laurels with the highest incarceration rate in the world. Reallocating portions of those police resources to people like counsellors hasn’t had dramatically better outcomes wherever it’s been tried (unlike throwing more money at the police, of course), but I’m clearly preaching to the choir on this one.

          I’d suggest you ease off the boot-licking a little - I think the boot polish might have gotten to your brain.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            make it near impossible for them to get employment upon release and just hope for the best?

            Nice hyperbole. Sorry man, I’m not going to argue with you because you’re not going to argue in good faith.

            Come back when you can use logic and reason instead of emotion.

            I’d suggest you ease off the boot-licking a little

            Yeah. The first number you call when there’s danger is 911. You’re not fooling anyone.

            Goodbye. Gonna block you now.

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Shame you can’t call the cops on anyone on the internet that calls you on your bullshit, eh?

              Background checks, and recidivism rates speak for themselves.

              What a fragile simpering dipshit you are.

      • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We need to rehabilitate the rapists and murderers. They super pinky promise not to rape or kill again!!! It was just one time, come on… have some compassion!!