• WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    You forgot a step. Short term vs long term planning.

    The problem with voting with your method is you only get to vote once. Every vote you need to make the decision:

    1. I should vote based on the optimal outcome of this election.

    2. I should vote based on the optimal outcome over many elections.

    It’s important that you first ask yourself this question. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. And often by voting for (1) you’re hurting (2).

    For example, everyone to the left of Republicans would have been better off if Trump had won in 2020. The primary process was rigged to keep progressive Democrats divided while forcing Biden through as the centrist compromise. People on the left tried to vote for progressive candidates, but the DNC rigged it so that all the centrists EXCEPT Biden dropped out early, while the progressive candidates had their vote divided. The DNC organized for Biden to win the primary. And then, in the general, everyone on the left held their nose and voted for him. They followed your advice to the letter, and everyone to the left of Republicans was massive harmed as the result of following your exact advice.

    Those on the left followed your instructions exactly, but they ended up with an inferior option than if they had voted third party.

    Biden winning in 2020 guaranteed a MAGA win in 2024. Biden was never going to make the changes needed to prevent MAGA from returning to power. This was predicted by many on the left before he was even sworn in.

    Trump in 2020 would have been far less dangerous than a Trump in 2024. He wouldn’t have had 4 years to regroup and plan out his whole Project 2025. He would have been a lame duck from day one, and he wouldn’t have had the political capital he came in with in 2024.

    Centrists, liberals, leftists, all of them did themselves a disservice by voting for Biden in 2020. Objectively, everyone EXCEPT Republicans would have had a better long-term outcome if Trump had won in 2020. But in your strategy, we’re not allowed to consider the long term effects of our decisions. We’re just supposed to myopically focus on this and only this election.

    • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump winning in 2020 being better is a BIG assumption that fails to consider just how bad things could have gone.

      Off the top of my head, would things be better right now if we’d had Turkey’s levels of inflation? How bad would poverty have gotten? How many people would’ve died from suicides and extra Covid deaths? Would he immediately have gone into revenge for BLM mode?

      There is a level of death and destruction that you are failing to consider.

      Also, really consider how this conspiracy to stop Bernie in 2020 is just the centrists making a strategic decision not to split the vote. In the French parliamentary elections, like 200 left-wing and centrist candidates withdrew from the second-round run-off races to avoid splitting the anti-far-right vote —Do you consider what they did to be unethical and a subversion of democracy?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      You claim to worry about long term planning when you don’t even have the hindsight of all the horrible shit happening we could have avoided.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the kind of moron speak we get from these people though. They pretend to care about stopping fascism but would gladly usher it in to tEaCh DeMoCrAtS a LeSsOn