• FuzzChef@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    I somehow doubt that this actually protects against kamikaze attacks, but it might prevent the attacker from “saving” it’s drone.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      How is this a software problem?

      I’m not aware of any drones equipped with top/rear facing cameras to detect attackers.

  • Five@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Cheap kamikaze drones have loose wires on the front. When the wires touch, like when they collide with an object in front of them, it completes a circuit that detonates the payload.

    A wide conductive screen mesh on the back of an interceptor drone seems like a cheap, simple countermeasure.

      • Five@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I don’t think the interceptor is expected to survive a successful interception. In the case of a miss, it will be reusable tho, unlike other defense munitions. If any parts of either drone survive, they’ll fall in defender controlled territory, and be available to be fed back into the drone manufacture supply chain.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          So how is this mesh helping in any way?

          If it misses, it still misses. If it takes a hit, it still goes down.

          • Five@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            The mesh increases the ‘hit box’ of the interceptor. It’s conductive, so it is more likely to trigger the kamikaze than a normal in-air collision.

            • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              According to the original telegram source, it is for defense:

              Захист мавіку від ворожих сіткометів та ударів зверху

              deepl.com:

              Protecting the mavic from enemy net-squads and overhead attacks

              Makes no sense against shrapnel, but they are using a lot of different interception techniques. I’ve seen physical impact, nets and dangling wires so far. And against these type of attacks such a cope cage style defense might actually work.