Today we’re very excited to announce the open-source release of the Windows Subsystem for Linux. This is the result of a multiyear effort to prepare for this, and a great closure to the first ever issue raised on the Microsoft/WSL repo:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL

  • Gumus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I know there’s a lot of hate for Microsoft on Lemmy, but WSL is one of the best parts of Windows. It’s really powerful and well integrated to Windows. Since I still can’t leave for pure Linux install, I’m glad for WSL.

    • Perish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      128
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Funny that the Linux is best part of Windows lmao

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The only Windows PC I use is my work computer.

      GPO blocked WSL.

      I can’t even escape to a command line with the right flavour of slashes between directories. For eight hours a day, all hope is lost.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      WSL made windows tolerable in the time I had to use a windows machine for work.

      macOS is still the better choice for corp approved work, integrates decently with IT systems and is a “real” unix system underneath.

      Linux on a corporate desktop is mostly about how well you know the IT guys and do they trust you. And of course the software stack.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Linux on a corporate desktop is mostly about how well you know the IT guys and do they trust you. And of course the software stack.

        I would say it depends more on the commitment of the IT admins to support and manage a fleet of Linux workstations. There are Linux “Active Directory” servers, configuration provisioning tools, ways to centrally and automatically rollout updates, etc. It really depends on if the IT guys invest the same amount of effort to support them or not.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          2000 people, 3k+ devices and one dude wants a Linux laptop.

          Not happening 😀

          But it did work in a smaller company of around 30 people, mostly because the IT guy was a Linux user too

          • cmhe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Well I worked for a while at a large international corporation that maintained (and AFAIK is still continuing) a managed Linux system, which worked well enough. And there where a lot more people, especially the people that were the most productive, interested in it.

            Sure that might have just been a nice island inside the larger company, but the people there were the internal consultants, which often had to pull other projects out of the gutter.

            If you over your specialists ways to use the tools they need, you will improve the whole company.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        IT just said no for WSL “ask your manager”

        My manager barely knows how to read his email

        and doesn’t understand why I want 3rd screen