Today we’re very excited to announce the open-source release of the Windows Subsystem for Linux. This is the result of a multiyear effort to prepare for this, and a great closure to the first ever issue raised on the Microsoft/WSL repo:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL

    • boaratio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So they can use Linux in the name, just not at the beginning? We’re so stupid. Can they do Windows Subsystem for Coke? Or Windows Subsystem for McDonald’s? Or Windows Subsystem for MacOs?

      Good gravy.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I mean I guess it makes some sense. Linux Subsystem for Windows to the uninitiated might sound like it “comes from the Linux brand”, whilst Windows Subsystem for Linux sounds more like its made by Windows.

        • psyvibe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I think this only applies to using the word “gravy” for payment services or a website referring to such a payment service. There was a prior trademark on the word for use with plush toy products.

          • Raltoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Indeed, it’s why Apple could be trademarked as the name of an electronics company. But you can’t rock up to the trademark office and register “Pear” for a company selling pear-related products.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yes, there are a bunch of trademarks on the word “gravy”, in different industries. I was going to link to that one you mentioned, because for some reason despite being plush toy products, the company holding it was Bob Evans. But it’s since been canceled, and the company name doesn’t appear on the page, so I chose an active trademark instead.