• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I think you possibly intended to reply to a different comment

    My comment was talking about heavily taxing 2nd properties (and implicitly any more after that)

    • cristian64@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I did mean to reply to your comment. Just trying to say that I don’t need 2nd homes to be taxed much more higher that 1st homes if the issue can be fixed without getting to that point. Although it shouldn’t be off the table if it’s necessary to guarantee people can have access to homes.