• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m not sure I understand what having equity when it comes to access to necessities would even look like. How would it be at all different than equality in that context?

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Through the definition of the words, it would mean that everyone gets, for example, chemo meds, regardless of if they have cancer. So, it doesn’t make much sense.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      In this context:

      • Equality could mean everyone gets one sack of rice regardless of their circumstances.

      • Equity could mean each person is given a type and quantity of food that is appropriate to their dietary needs and living situation.

      Equality is easier to achieve and may be just fine if your goal is just to make sure everyone is provided the minimum basic necessities of life. Equity is more complicated and way more involved in making sure that people are getting what they need to be on equal footing with regards to everyone else. One bag of rice will be worth more to some than others, after all.