Honestly, I briefly considered going to fish for the right symbol and I decided it wasn’t worth it.
I can’t decide if I’m annoyed or proud that obviously someone was going to get pedantic about it.
I genuinely thought people were going to pop out to mention I was saying design is a function of graphics with that second one before they did provide the symbol, so you’ve exceeded expectations there.
Well, I didn’t want to correct that because frankly “design is a function of graphics” is arguably true. The biggest problem with that notation is the possible implication that it’s only a function of graphics, which is obviously wrong, but as an informal notation I see no reason to insist it must be interpreted that way.
I would say design ⊃ graphics.
Honestly, I briefly considered going to fish for the right symbol and I decided it wasn’t worth it.
I can’t decide if I’m annoyed or proud that obviously someone was going to get pedantic about it.
I genuinely thought people were going to pop out to mention I was saying design is a function of graphics with that second one before they did provide the symbol, so you’ve exceeded expectations there.
Well, I didn’t want to correct that because frankly “design is a function of graphics” is arguably true. The biggest problem with that notation is the possible implication that it’s only a function of graphics, which is obviously wrong, but as an informal notation I see no reason to insist it must be interpreted that way.
Design tsu graphics
I’m afraid I don’t know what that means.
⊃ looks like つ (Japanese character from the Hiragana syllabary that is pronounced “tsu”)
(っ◔◡◔)っ