• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The idea that a you could put 100 people in a room with the best teacher, and they could all become excellent artists, is hopeful but naive.

    Put 100 people in a room with the best teacher, and the 1 student that likes the subject the most will be the best student.

    There’s different levels of interests between the students. A student that is very invested in the subject is going to learn more than a student that wishes they were doing anything else. That’s what happens when something “clicks” - when a student goes above and beyond the taught material because they’re always thinking about it. “Talent” is indistinguishable from enthusiasm.

    Sure, there are literal cognitive differences between people, but 99 times out of 100 “talent” is just passion imo

    • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s this. Everybody else’s take us missing this. I play a BUNCH of musical instruments, and when people are like, “Oh wow, how did you learn to play all of those. You must be so talented!” And I always say, “Time. Time and a lot of practice. And most importantly a LOT of patience with myself”.

      The thing is, to get good at something, you have to be bad at it first. And many people simply do not have the passion to keep pushing through the part where they’re bad at it.