When you figure a way out to make digital art with out any advanced tech I would be very impressed. Pretty sure you need a computer to make digital art and computers are pretty damn advanced tech.
Then instead of a subscription, you’re paying for a gpu and power. Not everyone has the money for a computer, but pretty much anyone can afford a pencil and paper.
Conversely, Cocteau wrote “Film will only become an art when its materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper.” Cameras: pretty cheap. Things to point them at: haven’t changed much.
If you’re using this tech to replace pencil and paper, it’s a hard sell. If you’re using it to replace Hollywood, it’s a steal.
You could run it on your own PC instead
You could also draw in the sand with a stick or piss in the snow. I’m pretty sure the point is it doesn’t take advanced technology to make art.
When you figure a way out to make digital art with out any advanced tech I would be very impressed. Pretty sure you need a computer to make digital art and computers are pretty damn advanced tech.
Nothing about the original post said anything about digital art, they just referred to art in general.
Yeah it didn’t take computers or anything to make art. More about the artists than the method right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv9Tb81yRgs
Then instead of a subscription, you’re paying for a gpu and power. Not everyone has the money for a computer, but pretty much anyone can afford a pencil and paper.
Conversely, Cocteau wrote “Film will only become an art when its materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper.” Cameras: pretty cheap. Things to point them at: haven’t changed much.
If you’re using this tech to replace pencil and paper, it’s a hard sell. If you’re using it to replace Hollywood, it’s a steal.