• Eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In January 2025, during routine reviews, we stumbled upon the deepin-feature-enable package, which was introduced on 2021-04-27 without consulting us or even informing us.

    Damm

    • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is quite a while, lol. To be fair though, there are an insane amount of lines in most packages. Quietly adding a brief line in a seemingly innocent features package is like hiding a needle in a haystack.

      Its easy to overlook things when you have a pile of packages to review during every routine. Its especially true if they missed it the first time, since its easier to review changes in a package rather than go through the whole thing again.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A needle in a tumbleweed, if you will. :p

        Yeah, it’s crazy it was hiding this long but I see this as a win that they dealt with it so swiftly and show they take their package security seriously.

        • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Yeah, it really speaks volumes about the devs. It means that no matter how innocent the package may be or how long its been there, they still pick through it all multiple times to make sure their users are safe and happy.

          But RIP Deepin users. Tbh though, I’ve been hanging around Linux forums a while and still have yet to see someone who actually daily drives Deepin, lol.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It seems to me that the offending dialog would only be triggered if you did a full fresh install. During the previous iteration of the testing, they probably had a VM somewhere with it installed; since the underlying packages were already present, the dialog would never have popped up.