• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    UK libel laws are fucking insane to me. Way over the top.

    Edit: You know what? In the USA, where you have to show actual harm, I’m happy to say that Lorna Rooke doesn’t just have the personality of Darth Vader. She fucking is Darth Vader.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      UK libel laws sound way more reasonable to me. They force you to take accountability for your speech. Generally opinions and even hyperbole are fine (e.g. in this case, it’s likely OK to say that you think this person is Darth Vader). But if you spout some nonsense factoid about someone, be prepared to have some proof. US could definitely use some of that (it would put a lot of right-wing media companies out of business immediately, and I’m all for it)

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      This was not libel.

      It was workplace harassment. And would also be a issue in the US.

      If you actually read what happened. The person that did this was an absolute arsehole.

      Filling in a personality test for a 3rd party while she is away. Then announcing your own negative result to all attendies when she arrives. While at an official work event.

      Is a clear case of harradement and abuse. The company not responding to this, And the victim feeling the need to resign. Is a valid reason to take it to court.

      PS Your response with 0 knowledge of the victim. Make you a bully. Anywhere.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If you actually read…

        I know that the law in the UK is fucking shit. I don’t know the details because I don’t practice law. I responded with my interpretation of what I thought I read, because I read it.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You responded to a law that was not in anyway a part of this case.

          You just used the case to express an unrelated opinion. One I happen to agree with. But not this case.

          You also used the opertunity to harness and bully someone. With no idea who she is or how she behaves.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            I know how she behaves about being compared to Vader and that’s by suing. I don’t respect that.