• BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    your opinion ≠ fact, although you’re welcome to attempt to prove your claim.

    • edward@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you saying that being a centrist and being unbiased are the same? Is there no such thing as a centrist bias?

      And don’t say I’m putting words in your mouth. You said that my comment isn’t fact, so what about it isn’t factual?

      Or are you saying the site does make that distinction? Because their scale of left bias - unbiased - right bias with a complete lack of centrist bias is proof that they don’t. Here’s the proof of my claim, right from their website, the center is labeled “least biased”:

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Amazing that a grown adult doesn’t understand the concept of bias. Wait till he discovers that what centrist opinions are changes from country to country. Gonna absolutely blow his mind.

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And don’t say I’m putting words in your mouth

        but that’s exactly what you did.

        You said that my comment isn’t fact, so what about it isn’t factual?

        you expressed an opinion.

        Because their scale of left bias - unbiased - right bias with a complete lack of centrist bias is proof that they don’t. Here’s the proof of my claim

        all that you’ve proven is that it is, in fact, you who cannot distinguish centrism from being unbiased because you conflate the center of a bias spectrum with political centrism in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed and you’e trying to inject political alignment as a:

        Straw man

        A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”

        • edward@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Please tell me where on their bias spectrum a centrist biased source would go. I’m not conflating anything, the site is.

          • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I just explained how that’s not what this spectrum illustrates. your lack of comprehension is not my responsibility.

            • edward@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What does the spectrum illustrate if not bias? Because it sure looks like it’s a scale of bias: Extreme Left Bias, Left Bias, Left-Center Bias, Least Bias, Right-Center Bias, Extreme Right Bias. And it sure seems to correspond with the part of the article right below it that explicitly says “Right-Center Bias

              And again, where would a centrist biased source go on that spectrum?

              Also: ad hominem if you want to just link logical fallacies.

              And it is your responsibility. You are trying to disprove what I said but have offered no proof otherwise.

              • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I already explained how that’s not what this spectrum illustrates. your lack of comprehension is not my responsibility.

                • edward@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What, political bias vs political alignment? Again, where would a heavily biased, centrist aligned source go on their graph? You haven’t answered that.

                  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I already explained how that’s not what this spectrum illustrates. your lack of comprehension is not my responsibility.

                  • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sealioning

                    Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter. It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”, and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings. The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki, which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.