• vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    She defended her child from a convicted sex offender and an undisciplined mongrel. Calling someone a bad word is not worse than committing murder. The fact that blacks have an issue with a word and not murder says a lot about their culture and lack of civility.

    She did nothing wrong.

    • DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Let’s start here, fuck you.

      Then, let’s move on to this, someone can be a cunt, and you can call them a cont for being one, but if your first response is to reference their race by calling them a racial slur, then your not as angry about them being a cunt as you are about their race. And that’s the problem.

      I don’t know what race you are, but your opinion is shit. Not “your white/black/Indian/Chinese/Mexican/etc opinion is shit”, it’s just you and your opinion that’s shit. See how it’s supposed to work?

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And she’s raising the cash on a supposedly “christian” go fund me-type site. Apparently “do unto others…” is not a thing with maga christians

  • AngelGoddess21@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seriously?!! I would let the parents of the child beat that woman’s ass. I would never call a child that name. A matter of fact, I don’t ever say that word to be mean or anything at all. It’s disrespect😤😤 People are really getting annoying…

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I’m glad to know I’m not a cunt who plays victim. I hate the n word but if I said it and got my ass kicked I wouldn’t be mad because I’ll know I deserved it.

    I hate how these people play victim whenever they face consequences…but can’t wait for Trump to give her the Medal of Honor. ( /s for the trump part)

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The video does not include her saying it to the kid directly, but to the man (presumably father) confronting her, multiple times. Then she admits that yeah she did call the child the n-word because “he acts like one”.

    She proudly and defiantly doubled and tripled down on it while being openly filmed. All she had to do was move on and nobody would have been the wiser. In a normal world, this would be a clear case of “play stupid games, win stupid prizes”.

    I truly hope the (presumably) dad also has some fundraising going on.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not being protective of telling children anything such, but I have used ethnic slurs in the past, especially when answering other insults. And when you were being unjustly attacked, then slipped and said something bad, and then are being attacked for that too as if that justified the beginning, then it’s a natural reaction to double down on the unfortunate words too.

      So, eh, depends on the situation. I think I have right to answer people attacking me and putting me into a fight-or-flight situation with any words, they’ll still be in the wrong. But if this is not what happened, then using someone’s race as an argument worthy of repetition should be punished.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t understand what the goal behind making this comment could have been. You start off admitting to using ethnic slurs with an almost “whoopsy daisie” tone. The comment you replied to told you the situation but you still add a hypothetical situation about when you think it would be reasonable to use them. And the appeal to “natural reaction” to defend something that should’nt have happened in the first place. “When people question why I shot a guy, my natural reaction is to shoot them too” doesn’t excuse why you did the thing that got you questioned. There is no situation where you are on the right side when using a slur.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          Ethnic slurs are a subset of insults here. Not much different from addressing someone’s body features, impairments, life story specifics.

          There is no situation where you are on the right side when using a slur.

          Of course there is, every time it’s a minor part of the event. Like 3000 is greater than 2001, despite 1 being greater than 0. Seems simple enough.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            Ethnic slurs are different because of their historical (and still contemporary) usage in dehumanizing and oppressing groups of people. And, again, why are you listing other ways to insult people, as if they are fine when they’re not?

            Life is a rarely a zero-sum exchange, and quite often both sides aren’t perfect people. Just because someone slapped you after you called them a slur doesn’t mean you’re now in the right because they escalated to physical violence.

            Like I fundamentally am having trouble relating to you on this. I can’t tell if your mental is that fucked, if you are terrible at explaining something I’m missing, or if you’re trying to troll. I’ve come across differences in opinions, based on severity and direction. It feels like we’re not using the same system.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They have a simplistic tit-for-tat moral code and ignore the relative degree of contempt telegraphed by different ethnic slurs. Trouble seems to find this sort of person wherever they are. They tend to not be very bright. They will not accept your advice. Best to move on.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            They have a simplistic tit-for-tat moral code

            The alternatives are limited to “my group is always right” and “I pick one aspect and ignore all others, and the one aspect is always arbitrarily chosen, and when the comparison kinda equals, the result is arbitrarily chosen”. If you have any to add, you are welcome.

            And the word “simplistic” is usually used by people unable to defend their position with actual points. It’s kinda useless otherwise.

            and ignore the relative degree of contempt telegraphed by different ethnic slurs.

            Since it is not given here what the particular slur would be compared against for any “relative degree”, your comment clearly presents you as someone who

            tends to not be very bright

            , and the advice I won’t accept wasn’t answering my comment. I said that a continuation of an argument doesn’t say much about the beginning.

  • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I guess her defense was that he was acting like a little n-word. Then other racists were like nodding their head saying I support this.