Is this a bit? I always understood “libertatianism” and “socialism” as contradicting terms, because any social organization evolves into a planned state. How can there be socialism without some form of plan or strategy? Also, isn’t libertarianism deeply dependant on corporate power abd privatizatuon forbpublic services?
it’s not a bit, libertarian socialism has been a major force in socialist spaces ever since the First International.
the “libertarians” you’re thinking of are posers that appropriate our ideas to advocate for capitalism without regulations.
anarchists want liberty from all hierarchies and all systems of oppression while right “libertarians” want liberty to oppress anyone who isn’t from the ruling class or isn’t white.
Is this a bit? I always understood “libertatianism” and “socialism” as contradicting terms, because any social organization evolves into a planned state. How can there be socialism without some form of plan or strategy? Also, isn’t libertarianism deeply dependant on corporate power abd privatizatuon forbpublic services?
it’s not a bit, libertarian socialism has been a major force in socialist spaces ever since the First International.
the “libertarians” you’re thinking of are posers that appropriate our ideas to advocate for capitalism without regulations.
anarchists want liberty from all hierarchies and all systems of oppression while right “libertarians” want liberty to oppress anyone who isn’t from the ruling class or isn’t white.