When it gets to the point AI is self-recursively improving itself, is this a version of ‘life’ as we know it? Perhaps with humans as the ultimate parent? In a sense those AIs would be our descendents.
My problem with Big Tech leading these efforts, is that they are so often anti-human welfare, why would we trust them with the issue of anyone else’s? Big Tech’s desire to have zero regulation is an expression of how little concern they have for other humans. The ease with which all the Big Tech firms help the military slaughter tens of thousands of civilians is another. I can’t help thinking they’ll use any effort to elevate AI ‘welfare’, to harm the interests of inconvenient humans, which means most of us to them.
I disagree. There are definitely people who sincerely believe in AI ‘consciousness’. Ironically, they are usually the first to throw about terms like ‘woo woo’ in any discussions about human consciousness.
“Sincerely believe in” means nothing at all. None of the LLMs that any of the AI companies have demonstrated have actual reasoning skills because that’s not how the technology works.
Its mimicry, and a poor form of it. These companies are talking about “reasoning, thinking AI” as marketing to keep the AI hype cycle going as the actual technology digs deeper into diminishing returns.
When it gets to the point AI is self-recursively improving itself, is this a version of ‘life’ as we know it? Perhaps with humans as the ultimate parent? In a sense those AIs would be our descendents.
My problem with Big Tech leading these efforts, is that they are so often anti-human welfare, why would we trust them with the issue of anyone else’s? Big Tech’s desire to have zero regulation is an expression of how little concern they have for other humans. The ease with which all the Big Tech firms help the military slaughter tens of thousands of civilians is another. I can’t help thinking they’ll use any effort to elevate AI ‘welfare’, to harm the interests of inconvenient humans, which means most of us to them.
This is marketing, pure and simple. There is no reasoning AI within any of these companies grasps.
I disagree. There are definitely people who sincerely believe in AI ‘consciousness’. Ironically, they are usually the first to throw about terms like ‘woo woo’ in any discussions about human consciousness.
“Sincerely believe in” means nothing at all. None of the LLMs that any of the AI companies have demonstrated have actual reasoning skills because that’s not how the technology works.
Its mimicry, and a poor form of it. These companies are talking about “reasoning, thinking AI” as marketing to keep the AI hype cycle going as the actual technology digs deeper into diminishing returns.
If someone believes a branch can swim, you should tell them scientists call it floating.