• reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Again, I’m NOT the one that needs to provide evidence, because I have made no claims.

    The ORIGINAL POSTER needs to provide proof because their “meme” is an infograph with a claim.

    You’re twisting the burden of proof, so go f yourself for your bad faith.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      if you can dismiss the proofless infograph without proof, I can dismiss your dismissal without proof. We can go on recursively all day.

      • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Not now that works. They made a claim without backing. They now need to prove it.

        I don’t need to prove my claim because I have no claim. My only request was a demand for proof for the original comic.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Look, if this were a publication in a scientific journal, sure.

          But it’s not. It’s a webforum. In casual conversation, you can gesture to the idea that there was more sealife before mechanization, pollution, and industrial fishing becacasue… yeah. Duh. Of course there was.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Your whole attitude has been bad faith from the beginning. I think your curiosity would have gone over a lot better had you stopped before saying “Or is this just wish-fulfillment hogwash?”

      I don’t see why you had to start off so combative.