• reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So you feel good about downvoting someone for rightfully pointing out a lack of evidence, then sending a link to an entire book review which might or might not even show evidence of the thing I was asking for?

      LMFAO.

      • 257m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Dude, you said show “proof” and he showed proof. Dunno what you are complaining about. How was he supposed to prove anything without linking to an external source?

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I didnt downvote you. I’m not going to do research for you. Linking a book review should be enough to prove it wasn’t pulled out of this air.

        • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Burden of proof is on the person who posted, so certainly not you. But they’re quiet and you’re out here telling me to research why the meme is correct.

          That amounts to saying you don’t know how to prove it, and believe it on pure subjective opinion. Which makes whatever you link idiotic since it might not even prove what you’re trying to say.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            The review goes over some of the methodology.

            and believe it on pure subjective opinion.

            I’m not saying that.

            Edit: if you’re saying it’s based on nothing then I expect you to have looked into it, yes

            • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Why should I, as the person receiving a meme, research why it is based on fact and not fiction?

              That’s not how the burden of proof works.

              • 257m@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Because you asked for it? Someone posted a dumb meme and didn’t cite it with studies and now you are mad. You do have some burden since you are the one who started the discussion on proof in the first place. If you can’t even be bothered to look at the proof they bring, its not their problem.

                • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Any media with years, density, “shifting baseline syndrome” is not a meme, it’s an infograph disguised as a meme.

                  So yes, your “meme” requires proof. And you’re a propagandist idiot if you think otherwise.

                  • 257m@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    There is no secret agenda here. Its just a dumb meme. You can a meme with the words “shifting baseline syndrome” if you want. In fact you can put whatever you want in a meme.