• bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You know, you only need to be around 5% smarter than the tool you are using to be successful with it. Humanity is right fuckered isn’t it?

  • Juliee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    His life was set to ‚dim’ for six years
    Cause in the dark no one could see his tears

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Once you get used to proper bias lighting, suddenly overhead lamps become insufferable. I don’t know how people do it.

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      what’s bias lighting? i’ve never heard of it and if it works as a complete replacement to overhead lamps, i don’t think looking it up showed me the right thing

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Lights that you place behind things, like your bookshelf, TV/monitor, bedframe, etc. It’s so much more cozy and inviting compared to direct lighting. Like the other person said, a simple cheap lamp works wonders.

  • No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    My grandmother gifted me their old TV back in the 2000s because it was only showing black and white.

    They had a mechanic look at it, who said it was broken

    There was a button to change the saturation and get the TV back to show colours

    Edit: There and their

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Ha. I had a coworker gift me a high end amp because the volume was all crackly. Opened it up sprayed electronic cleaner on the volume rheostat thingy and gave it a few back and forth turns. Perfect sound. I offered it back but he’d already purchased a new one. :/

      • toddestan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I had something similar, except it was a blown fuse.

        Granted, the fuse was soldered in place and you had to take it apart to get to it. But once it was replaced it worked perfectly. No idea why the fuse blew either, unless it was just defective.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I know someone who bought a new laptop and complained that the display broke after only a couple weeks

      It only showed a super dim display and the viewing angle sucked

      I pressed the fancy new “privacy screen” button and it “worked flawlessly” again

  • hakase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Me plugging my monitor into my mobo instead of my graphics card for three years. I thought I had just gotten reeeeally unlucky in the silicon lottery.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Last time I did that I just didn’t get any output to the monitor, isn’t that how it’s supposed to work?

      • festnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        one time i was testing something with the monitor in the motherboard, which worked fine, and then i put the gpu in the motherboard but forgot to plug the monitor in the gpu, and it showed a black screen.

        there might be systems where you can plug both a gpu and the igpu into the monitor and it’ll use one for most things and the other for games and stuff (i dont remember what that is called), but i have only ever seen that in laptops so idk

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Massively depends on the system.

        if you get a F series CPU with no igpu then you will likely get no output.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The idea that people are making fake greentext screen shots is both puzzling and embarrassing. If you have the idea, just post it as a normal comment somewhere else—forging 4Chan screens is the path of madness.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Be me

        see qt 3.14

        wanttosex.exe

        Show her my translated green text

        She rips off her clothes

        Give her the best three minutes of her my life

        See you later virgins

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is a green text actually a 4chan screen?

        Or is it a distinct meme template to tell stories in ab engaging way that just happened to originate on 4chan?

        Especially when the content literally never existed on 4chan, it looks like it but isnt.

        I ask this with some rhetoric. We did click the content. Would it have been equally enjoyable as a twitter post: “after 6 years of living in the dark i discovered my light is dimmable, fuck me”?

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          Greentext definitely did exist on 4Chan before becoming a meme format, and even then, it only became a meme format because screenshots were an easy way to transfer the gold out of the sludge mines of 4Chan.

          The idea of greentext is good, but photoshopping fake 4Chan screens is like digging up your dead grandma and puppeteering her corpse to prove that you definitely didn’t write a birthday card to yourself.

          It’s time to start posting new greentext as text so people will screenshot Lemmy. Let the old bones of 4Chan rest until they may or may not be reincarnated by the admins.

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is the future we should be trying to build. A tiny tweak could make that text green, and then the prophecy would be fulfilled.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I am in agreement but also doubt.

            With the name and look, new users will still be looking for the old name.

            It also asks the question if we can post new format content under the old name and communities, tags? That probably depends on the community.

            Basically it calls for sitting around the table to discuss what a green text is and what it is not. Are we really organized enough for this?

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Greentext is green, puts the reader in the shoes of the subject, and usually ends in a short line of non-green commentary. It isn’t a terribly hard concept to transfer somewhere else.

              Rather than Frankenstein the past like a save icon, we could be finding ways to make quoted text green in this community on Lemmy, thus fulfilling the requirements.

              • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Pictures get way more engagement than text posts though. Platforms and app feeds are heavily biased to show thumbnails.

                Just a bit of css also wont retain its meme if people want to copy it.

                To make it an easily sharable meme of which text color cannot be altered. It must be a picture of green quoted text.

                I would also kinda argue the picture within often does add something, provides a sliver of information about the speakers personality. Sometimes “Picture unrelated” ads to humor.

                The pattern of where that picture is in relation to the text helps the pattern recognition of “this is a greentext” again.

                Basically just cut off the top line and we’re good.

                • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  But the original greentext isn’t a picture—only normies on other platforms than 4Chan end up with that format unless it is a fabricated one like this.

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        you’re right… it is fake, and yet it is true. so is it true or is it fake? and if it’s fake, is it a less or more genuine greentext?

        But here’s the real question: did OP convert a TIFU to greentext themselves, or did they use AI?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It still wouldn’t be dim, it would either work or not. If it’s dim, it’s either a bad bulb or a setting on the light housing causing less voltage (I think?) to make it to the bulb.

        • exasperation@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          or a setting on the light housing causing less voltage (I think?) to make it to the bulb

          Aren’t you just describing dimmers, the topic of the post?

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Exactly!

            I’m saying the likelihood of the socket/housing causing a dim light is vanishingly small, so OP should have caught this 6 years ago if they had even a passing understanding of how lights work.

            My immediate asumption without looking it up was either it’s not getting the right voltage or enough amperage since electricity is generally passed through to lights, so it would either work or not. So, either the bulb is bad (old lights get dim) or there’s a setting somewhere on the fan or switch messing with the voltage or current. My first guess is the bulb, and if two fail, I’d check the fan.

            After a quick search, apparently dimmers are fancier than that, and they actually modify the signal instead of adjusting voltage or amperage. But my initial intuition wasn’t far off. The power is indeed on or off, and something else was interfering (the dimmer). If the fan didn’t have the capability to adjust brightness, there would be no reason to interfere with the signal.

            Simple logical deduction based on a passing understanding of electricity and lights would’ve led to the problem.

            • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              it’s less that dimmers are fancier than you thought and more like adjusting voltage or amperage without ridiculous losses is hard and or significantly more expensive than you thought.

              • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Dimmers are incredibly simple with just triac and a variable resistor. However LEDs and CFLs do not work well with triac dimmers since they normally are expecting full voltage. Thats why you need “dimmable bulbs” becsuse they have circuitry to account for different voltages.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Makes sense.

                My point is that a little bit of deduction should lead someone to the conclusion that the dim light was an intentional feature going “wrong” or a bad bulb.

            • exasperation@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              The integrated circuits in a lot of lighting fixtures (and you know OP’s light is run by integrated circuit because it can be controlled by remote) are basically a black box of complexity where things can go wrong in a non-intuitive way. Some kind of failure to deliver sufficient power to a particular bulb or LED or other element isn’t necessarily an indication of anything in particular.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I doubt they’re all that complex. It’s probably something like a relay for the light, plus an analogue chip to control the dimming, which is likely completely separate from the digital logic (remote, motor control, etc).

                I wouldn’t expect OP to know anything about circuits though, but I do expect the bare minimum educated guess that a dim light isn’t likely a bad fan and is either a bad bulb or a setting somewhere, because a light going dim because on an electrical problem is incredibly unlikely.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on the CFL. I had to replace one in a fixture in my new house a few months after I bought it, and it was some goofy round one with a rectangular attachment point and some clips. Thankfully it was pretty easy to replace and was easily gettable from Dom Depot, but I was definitely surprised by the socket when I went to replace it.

      • toddestan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        That sounds like one of those fixtures where the ballast is in the fixture and the bulb is just a bulb, similar to a regular fluorescent light fixture. As opposed to the screw-in CFLs that most people are familiar with where the bulb also contains the ballast.

        Those are kind of unusual in homes - I’ve mostly seen them in commercial applications like hotels and stuff like that.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Worst case scenario just replace the light kit and check your wiring but yeah obviously that wasn’t OP’s issue

      Of course doing that with the fan still together/hanging is much more of a pain than just getting a new one, usually, especially if the fan is old. Most other electricians I know don’t bother doing ceiling fan repairs, they’ll swap em but any more than that’s not worth their time. I’ll do whatever but I’ll be up front about it.

      Especially since you’re usually doing it for retired folks who can only afford so much…