• Draghetta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The idea of a console where the manufacturer doesn’t have total control over the OS is ludicrous, no way a Windows box is ever going to “kill” the deck

    • intelati@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The internet connection is my limiting factor. 15GB or on lunch/break. 😭

      Portal is crisp and clean.

      I heard Fallout 4 is good.

      OOTP could run on an XP machine from 2003.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fallout 4 is awesome.

        I’m bored with it at the moment. Been playing Red Dead 2. Oh my god what a game. Makes me regret not playing the first one.

        • intelati@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s been a couple months. I modded it to heck and always have issues with the Nuka World Quests.

          I’m ready to go back now.

          • theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s been awhile, but that one where you have to find all of those circuit boards or whatever, god I hate that quest.

            My main issue with fallout 4 is I can never beat it because I don’t want to betray anyone haha.

            I thought I could make myself this time around. Nope.

            On my Xbox I have like 15 days play time. It’s crazy.

  • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also funny how they keep adding shit no one needs that just makes battery life worse

    Yes let me drop $700 on a handheld so I can play it plugged in on the couch

  • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking hell the “Steam Deck killers” is a stupid trend.

    They really do hit you with all the specs that are supposed to put the deck to shame, but the reveal their ludicrous price, completely ignoring the major advance the things has.

    That’s a simple trick, but cheap and dirty, so it’s pretty garbo anyway. No respect for handhelds themselves or anyone reviewing them or taking any sponsorship that do anything like that.

  • float@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imho, the Steam Deck will be the only one with a really long product lifetime. Simply because Valve’s main business is selling games, not consoles. The Deck makes people buy more/different games. Worked on me. I haven’t played much in the last decade because I was too tired to play at my PC after work. Now I can play everywhere. Couch, bed, car, … Basically every other manufacturer makes money exactly once by selling such a console. As soon as their marketing is done with it, they’ll release a new revision and you won’t see a single software update for the old model ever again.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, there are a number of features for Valve to do this right:

      supporting linux frees them of the eternal windows shackles that pc-gaming has become, diversifies steam as a multi-platform service (not just pc gaming juggernaut) without encroaching on anyone else’s terrain, and gets their user’s enormous libraries out into the world, potentially enabling new kinds of games in the future.

    • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, but the same is true for brands selling desktops or laptops with windows, where they only make money once on the hardware (and maybe some additional money by installing subscription crapware like mc afee etc.).

      • float@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true. And that’s the reason why you’ll get one or two firmware/driver updates and that’s it. These companies have work to do on the other hand. A laptos or desktop is a widespread product. Valve had to go a long way to make the Deck happen.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could, but what makes Steam Deck special is that it’s SteamOS is built specifically for that hardware, enabling functions you wouldn’t normally see in gaming PC hardware.

        • krathalan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least one of the main features is seamless suspend/resume. Not sure what the state of that is on Windows but I’ve seen a lot of people mention that SD feature specifically.

        • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Small nitpick. I’m not sure why you don’t like the idea of the vendor having stuff installed on hardware they make, to ensure it functions optimally. Like, on a primary compute device, sure, be picky about the OS. But this is a game platform. Nobody gives a shit that Nintendo makes their own OS for their hardware, why does anyone care how the Steam Deck does it’s thing?

            • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair enough! I mean, that would be really nice tbh. Also it makes me realize that consoles only exist for DRM, which is sucky. Granted, I stopped buying consoles almost a decade ago, so I never stopped to think about it.

    • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The difference is that if the device comes with Steam OS, then it’s ready to go out of the box and you’re assured the hardware has good Linux support.

      If it’s originally a Windows device then you may have to jump through additional hoops to get everything working. Also you’ll have to deal with allowing other OS’s in the BIOS if it’s locked.

      Also you’ve paid Microsoft for a license you won’t use.

      The flip side is that there’s work to make a native Steam OS build for 3rd party portable devices:

      https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/06/the-linux-coders-turning-the-rog-ally-and-other-handhelds-into-steam-deck-clones/

      and

      https://chimeraos.org/

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you like the hardware of one of the others more. I think the Legion Go looks pretty sweet. Wonder if it could make a good daily driver even.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used the steam deck as a daily driver between laptops. It was good enough to the point that if I had a decent mobile monitor, I would consider it exclusively for a travel rig.

          • darq@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am looking specifically for a single device for travelling with. But the built in controllers of the Steamdeck are just a little too goofy for me to give it much serious consideration.

            A tablet form-factor Steamdeck? I’d be sold.

          • MajinBlayze@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve got an external monitor and my full keyboard and mouse with a dock and my steam deck. I can set up anywhere with a desk and game, program, whatever. I’ve found very little that it can’t handle.

              • MajinBlayze@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m using this portable monitor but it is kind of finicky, and I worry it’ll break easily. It’s the biggest one I could find at a reasonable price, and happens to fit my backpack.

                I’ve used it with my 3440x1440 freesync monitor at home, and it works as well, but like anything, whether you can game at that resolution is very dependant on the specific game and settings you use.

                I’ll add, because the deck doesn’t have thunderbolt, plan on using HDMI instead of type c. It’s possible you can find a type c (non-thunderbolt) dock that supports powering and driving a monitor over type c along with the deck, but I wasn’t able to find one.

          • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Outside of the better gpu, the one advantage the other devices have is emulation. Steamdeck sits on the edge of performance for some of the harder to emulate devices heavy titles (PS3, Switch). The ones using Ryzen 3/4 would trivially handle emulation better than the Steamdecks CPU, which uses Ryzen 1+ (part of the reason why its low cost)

  • .:\dGh/:.@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally agree.

    Not only they can’t sell the device at a loss, but also they have to use Windows for driver compatibility.

    What’s holding back the Steam Deck, and the whole gaming on the go, it’s x86. For the rest, it’s x86 plus Windows plus drivers.

    The one to win will be who makes a tightly coupled device that’s also efficient. Apple is good at that, but has nowhere near the catalogue than Steam and lacks a Steamworks SDK.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where are the true killers with arm based chips? And how is the linux version of rosetta 2 doing? Can we run x86 games on arm Linux?

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And how is the linux version of rosetta 2 doing?

      What? You mean how is the linux version of mac version of qemu? Alive and kicking! Same for box86 and box64. Binary tralsators existed before Apple started making x86 computers.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, i was very late with this whole arm hype 😅 never knew that rasp pi was arm prior Apple silicone 🫣 But Indeed, it is very nice seeing that fast progress there and I hope linux arm goes mainstream and thus get even more supported by app developers and investors.

    • velovix@hedge.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t Apple’s chips have specific hardware support to make Rosetta 2 as effective as it is? I’ve been really hoping other manufacturers find a way to do something similar.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about hardware support, but I found this article on box86.org which seems to be the best alternative to rosetta on Linux. The performance drop on box64 vs native is still much greater than the performance drop in rosetta:

        https://box86.org/2022/03/box86-box64-vs-qemu-vs-fex-vs-rosetta2/

        Edit: many infos about Rosetta under the hood: https://github.com/FFRI/ProjectChampollion

        I found nothing, that implies that there would be specific hardware features in m1 for making the translation faster. Only that it does translation mainly ahead-of-time (AOT) and saves “that version” of the app somewhere as cache). I only scrolled through it and did not read it all, so maybe I missed it.

  • baatliwala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s because normal Linux won’t be as optimised but unlike Valve they don’t want to put actual work into optimising it.

  • rtsuya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    if I don’t own any steam games, are any of these other options better than the steam deck? or is steam deck still the way to go for non steam games?

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have better performance, so if you play plugged in or play a game that’s not great in Proton you might benefit.

      For unplugged, nobody has yet beat the 5W performance of the Steam Deck

    • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean it doesn’t have a disc drive and the base OS is Linux, so if the game you want to play doesn’t work on Linux it won’t work on the Linux version of Steam Deck, if that is what you’re asking. If you know how to make isos and move them over if the game requires, you can install windows on the steam deck and basically run anything that the steam deck can handle hardware wise whether its on steam or not. Ive seen people who installed windows on it or also kept the original Linux Steam OS play many non-steam games. Some of these other devices were built with Windows though from the ground up though if you don’t want to reinstall anything or deal with drivers, I personally plan on getting a Steam Deck here in a few months next Christmas then replacing Linux with Windows so i know for sure my software will work as sacrilegious as it is.

      • Arcka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        it doesn’t have a disc drive

        False. Only the least expensive model has eMMC for the built-in storage. The other models have replaceable (upgradable) NVMe SSDs.

        • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, wooosh. A disc drive is an optical drive like a Blu-ray, DVD, or cd drive. Go ahead,show me the built in disc drive on a steam deck and not a USB connected one.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t bought a game on optical media since 2003, that being Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne

              • desconectado@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you don’t mind me asking, what do you use it for?

                Also, HDD are hard disc drives, so technically hard drives can be disc drives too, that’s why the replier misunderstood you.

                • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes HDD are disc based tech, yet I’ve never heard them refered to as just a disc drive without the hard despite having a platter disc in them. While not being the end all be all, wikipedia has disk or disc drives listed as referring to purely optical media.

                  And I use them to access a plethora of media from old back ups/family pictures, DVDs/Blu-ray, backing up said DVD/Blu-ray to Plex if I like them that much I want them digitally, old games(my oldest still useable disc is my 1998 minted “GOTY” Diablo 1.) Also just never hurts to have the ability to burn a CD or DVD either, though mainly still get the use out of CD burning for cars without an aux.

          • Arcka@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, I obviously interpreted that as meaning a hard disk drive (which SSDs are still commonly referred to as HDDs) since we were discussing modern PCs. Many years ago external physical file transfer mostly transitied away from using actual spinning disks to USB storage, and even that has been mostly supplanted by network connected storage for several years.