• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You would have to be able to concretely define what "intelligence " is first before you can do that.

    The Turing test is not a valid determiner because the thought process behind it is 80 years out of date. Intelligence has to be capable of actually processing data on its own without external sources to draw from. Otherwise it’s just copying and pasting in approximation of language and art. See article below:

    https://www.techradar.com/news/calm-down-folks-chatgpt-isnt-actually-an-artificial-intelligence

    As the article states, these things should be called GANs but that doesn’t sound as sexy as AI.

    This goes for Stable Diffusion as well as every other generative art program in existence.

    Not at all. AI models are constantly developing. Compared to even a year ago they’re so much more advanced and there’s no reason to believe we’ve hit any sort of peak. And from what I can from my freinds that are still in Acedemia and places like deep mind, there are some truly groundbreaking changes coming pretty soon.

    https://youtu.be/-wzOetb-D3w

    It’s all hype in order to get investment dollars. These will never become AGI or anything close. They don’t “think”, they simply search their databases based on inputs and then output the closest approximation of what the user is asking for. It’s why AI art always looks wonky and LLMs output made up garbage.