• MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of course they did. All of these companies are against anything that challenges them.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Challenging them is one thing. Disrupting the CEO’s public speech is another. I think almost every company would fire any employee who did that for any reason.

      • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think we all need to remember that no CEO’s speech is more important that stopping human rights violations. Imagine if we had to wait until Hitler was done speaking to do anything

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            Seriously who cares about what a PR department thinks. Their job is literally to lie and manipulate people.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                It’s about psychological manipulation. PR is really just propaganda renamed and repackaged. I don’t believe they should be able to practice what they do at all.

                If their craft was allowed they should be held to a high standard with a stringent set of ethics backed up by laws.