cm0002@lemmy.world to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoIt's Greek to mei.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down14cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1593arrow-down1external-linkIt's Greek to mei.imgur.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square60fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squaretan00k@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 days agohttps://ustr.gov/issue-areas/reciprocal-tariff-calculations
minus-squareshawn1122@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-22 days agoI love how they cite multiple papers to justify setting phi at 0.25 but for epsilon it essentially just says ‘it’s 4’
minus-squaremmddmm@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21 day agoJust the fact that they used constants in a market-changing action shows they have no idea what the equation even means. (OMG, the abstract on the first reference already says constants are useless to understand the market, without changing anything!)
minus-squareprotist@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoOh my god I can’t believe someone sat down and wrote all that using jargon they clearly don’t understand. I love the references thrown in at the end to try to make it seem professional lmao
https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/reciprocal-tariff-calculations
I love how they cite multiple papers to justify setting phi at 0.25 but for epsilon it essentially just says ‘it’s 4’
Just the fact that they used constants in a market-changing action shows they have no idea what the equation even means.
(OMG, the abstract on the first reference already says constants are useless to understand the market, without changing anything!)
Oh my god I can’t believe someone sat down and wrote all that using jargon they clearly don’t understand. I love the references thrown in at the end to try to make it seem professional lmao
Lol! Thanks for link