Yes it does, inference and correlation you’ll note I provided three of the largest labor statistics in the USA. Do some math and leg work on your own, I’m not your goddamn professor and if I were I still wouldn’t and you’d be failing.
That’s a picture and you already said it isn’t dead you’re just lazy or uninventive.
No, it doesn’t. I can’t invent numbers out of thin air like you do.
That’s a picture and you already said it isn’t dead you’re just lazy or uninventive
I was able to access it further down the thread, yes.
You are no doubt making this comment in hopes of getting me to make a bunch of comments about the PDF, so that your lie about me having made “like 7 comments” about the link, when I had made two (one saying I couldn’t access it, and one addressing the contents once I was able to) would appear to be true to anyone not following the timestamps.
They’re not invented they’re the result of research you can do on your own and prove yourself. Don’t take my word, no one should but you’ve got everything you need to figure it out yourself since no amount of other people explaining how and why you’re wrong is having any effect.
Yeah that means it isn’t dead it means you’re dumb, lazy or arguing in bad faith. You’ve made several about it not working, you’ve made several about is content’s but remind me, is 4 more than two.
I have no need for shame bud, I relish putting lazy trolls in their place and you simply can’t keep up.
You have to put it in Google because it’s a direct link to a pdf and the labor website doesn’t like to redirect those. Learn to use the Internet and cry less.
Yes, I’m sure everyone understood that when you posted the link, it needed to be copy-pasted into google, since that’s what everyone does with links. You know you can just say things without hurling random insults, right?
The pdf breaks it down by race, age, gender, full-time vs part-time, and by state - but notably, not by education level. Which you would know if you actually read it before posting.
Maybe not, rest assured if it were anyone else I would just provide the pdf but you, no no trolls gotta do their own work.
Jesus Christ stop crying about that single pdf. You’ve been offered more than a dozen but you can’t stop crying about that one single page that says something in a way you in particular don’t understand.
Maybe not, rest assured if it were anyone else I would just provide the pdf but you, no no trolls gotta do their own work.
Mhm.
Jesus Christ stop crying about that single pdf.
I made literally one single comment addressing the contents of the pdf, after reading it as you asked, and finding that you were, like with every other “source” you’d provided, lying about what it said.
You’ve been offered more than a dozen
I have been offered 4 links, none of which contained the relevant information, despite you lying and claiming that they did each time.
but you can’t stop crying about that one single page that says something in a way you in particular don’t understand.
Again, one comment saying I couldn’t access it, and one comment after accessing it and reading it addressing the contents. You are clearly trolling and being randomly hostile for no reason. If I didn’t address it, you’d attack me for ignoring it instead.
You’ve made about 7 dude, why lie about what is clearly evident.
Il they indeed do contain what you’re looking for, they don’t however have it in books underlined at the top in a way that an especially slow 3yr old could understand. Look it up, is like 8% of college graduates in unions.
You’ve made about 7 dude, why lie about what is clearly evident.
I have no idea why you would lie when it’s clearly evident that you’re wrong, both about that claim and in general. Other than that you’re a troll who lies as easily as they breathe.
Look it up, is like 8% of college graduates in unions.
Oh really? Where did you find that number? How deep in there was it, and did you wash your hands afterwards?
Statistics and math you goddamn bafoon what the fuck do you think I’ve been telling you to do it for. You’re arguing in bad faith, lazy or stupid, we get it no need to prove that any further.
It does break it down by student but sure, try that plus math instead. I know you won’t but at least you have less to cry about.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjd7PT3hZeMAxW97skDHWKZNKkQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0HaIZ1pdWDSMkqF6FkilVr
That’s exactly the claim you made or is basic understanding of the English language the hangup here.
No, it doesn’t.
Dead link.
Yes it does, inference and correlation you’ll note I provided three of the largest labor statistics in the USA. Do some math and leg work on your own, I’m not your goddamn professor and if I were I still wouldn’t and you’d be failing.
That’s a picture and you already said it isn’t dead you’re just lazy or uninventive.
No, it doesn’t. I can’t invent numbers out of thin air like you do.
I was able to access it further down the thread, yes.
You are no doubt making this comment in hopes of getting me to make a bunch of comments about the PDF, so that your lie about me having made “like 7 comments” about the link, when I had made two (one saying I couldn’t access it, and one addressing the contents once I was able to) would appear to be true to anyone not following the timestamps.
You really are quite shameless.
They’re not invented they’re the result of research you can do on your own and prove yourself. Don’t take my word, no one should but you’ve got everything you need to figure it out yourself since no amount of other people explaining how and why you’re wrong is having any effect.
Yeah that means it isn’t dead it means you’re dumb, lazy or arguing in bad faith. You’ve made several about it not working, you’ve made several about is content’s but remind me, is 4 more than two.
I have no need for shame bud, I relish putting lazy trolls in their place and you simply can’t keep up.
You have to put it in Google because it’s a direct link to a pdf and the labor website doesn’t like to redirect those. Learn to use the Internet and cry less.
Yes, I’m sure everyone understood that when you posted the link, it needed to be copy-pasted into google, since that’s what everyone does with links. You know you can just say things without hurling random insults, right?
The pdf breaks it down by race, age, gender, full-time vs part-time, and by state - but notably, not by education level. Which you would know if you actually read it before posting.
Maybe not, rest assured if it were anyone else I would just provide the pdf but you, no no trolls gotta do their own work.
Jesus Christ stop crying about that single pdf. You’ve been offered more than a dozen but you can’t stop crying about that one single page that says something in a way you in particular don’t understand.
Mhm.
I made literally one single comment addressing the contents of the pdf, after reading it as you asked, and finding that you were, like with every other “source” you’d provided, lying about what it said.
I have been offered 4 links, none of which contained the relevant information, despite you lying and claiming that they did each time.
Again, one comment saying I couldn’t access it, and one comment after accessing it and reading it addressing the contents. You are clearly trolling and being randomly hostile for no reason. If I didn’t address it, you’d attack me for ignoring it instead.
You’ve made about 7 dude, why lie about what is clearly evident.
Il they indeed do contain what you’re looking for, they don’t however have it in books underlined at the top in a way that an especially slow 3yr old could understand. Look it up, is like 8% of college graduates in unions.
I have no idea why you would lie when it’s clearly evident that you’re wrong, both about that claim and in general. Other than that you’re a troll who lies as easily as they breathe.
Oh really? Where did you find that number? How deep in there was it, and did you wash your hands afterwards?
Look up 4ish comments dipshit.
Statistics and math you goddamn bafoon what the fuck do you think I’ve been telling you to do it for. You’re arguing in bad faith, lazy or stupid, we get it no need to prove that any further.