• Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure someone else did, it’s irrelevant because I provided links and you didn’t bother to do any research you just discarded them by look alone. So again dumb or not arguing in good faith so you can drop the indignation as it’s fairly stale.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

      Here’s a link that proves every claim you made this whole conversation is wrong. It literally says on this page that, in this specific comment chain, nobody had provide a link to a source at the time you claimed they had. The link is: https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/

      See, I can provide irrelevant links and lie about what they say just like you do.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

        Who cares?! You have them now and you’re not bothering to use them because you don’t care you’d rather just object to object.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I literally did use them and they didn’t show anything you claimed they showed after I said they wouldn’t and you doubled down that they did. I literally provided screenshots. Liar and troll.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I didn’t at first, then I went back and did.

              How do you think I got screenshots of the page without visiting the page, exactly? Please tell me, I’m fascinated to hear your explanation.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Yeah that’s called inconsistency like I said.

                The point isn’t to screenshot it, it’s too use the bar resources of the aflcio, nlrb and BLS websites which provide pretty literally any statistics you’re curious about. Your laziness or inability to do research isn’t my concern, I’m not your teacher so I’m just going to point you in the right direction and how you can figure it out on your own. You apparently can’t or didn’t and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  You could’ve used any of the resources you mentioned to accesses the relevant statistics. Your laziness or inability to do research isn’t my concern, I’m not your teacher. You apparently can’t or didn’t want to find the information and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    You mean I could teach you how to do research but doing it for you. You won’t learn if entering is just handed to you. Critical thinking and moderate motivation would a answer every question you’ve posed including your modified version you’re claiming now.

                    As for the rest.

                    semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit

                    You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.