• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I honestly don’t understand what’s insightful about it. It encourages a functional viewpoint that results in you inventing proposed uses for something that is a vestige of an inefficiency. Justifying something useless isn’t curiosity, it’s just masturbation. You should identify how a structure interacts with it’s current environment. There’s a reason functionalism is considered worthless in sociology.

    • TheMagicRat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      I think the point is more that you should take care to consider why it was put there because it might be something that is not immediately obvious.

      You should identify how a structure interacts with it’s current environment.

      OK, but what if it was put there to stop something that only happens once every 10 years? Without taking the time to learn this, you might tear it down and then after a few years you’re scrambling to solve a problem that was already solved.