• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. You’ll probably be assigned a job that’s required to be done for the good of society.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of that one twitter thread “what will your job be in the commune” and everyone said the most useless shit like “I have bad anxiety and can’t work but I can bake everyone cookies 😊” and the one guy who chimed in “I have a background as a Carpenter so probably just keep my construction job” got roasted for being a conservative and capitalist in the replies. I’ll try to find it.

      Edit: sorry for the redtit link but here’s a good screencap

      https://www.reddit.com/r/twittermoment/comments/pi8asy/the_legendary_whats_your_job_on_the_leftist/

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The assumption here being that we live in scarcity? That worker productivity is directly tied to the amount of time worked? That people won’t take difficult jobs like being a doctor without the financial incentive?

          • Gorilladrums@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The assumption here being that we live in scarcity?

            This isn’t an assumption, this is objective fact, we don’t have infinite resources.

            That worker productivity is directly tied to the amount of time worked?

            It’s not 1:1, but there’s a strong correlation between productivity and time. Obviously having workers work 16 hours a day is not going to go well in terms of productivity, but a person who works 6 months of the year and a person who works 10 months of the year are not going to have the same annual productivity. The person who worked for 10 months is going to be more productive because they put in more time.

            That people won’t take difficult jobs like being a doctor without the financial incentive?

            What’s the mystery here? Money is indeed a big incentive. Why would anybody spend about 14 years of their life after high school studying very difficult subjects to work very demanding jobs if they end getting paid as much as a delivery driver? Might as well become a delivery driver and save your save a decade and a half of stress.

    • Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seeing as how in most markets you can’t exactly do what you want for a living (or even close), or acquire the skills because they’re behind a steep pay wall, and the only employment you can find is very limited in scope to what the community wants, what’s the difference? Most jobs might as well be issued in the mail.

    • aport@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It blows my mind the people who think, “after the revolution I’m going to be a dog walker and bake dog treats!” When in reality they will probably die in a labor camp.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not die in a labor camp, but they won’t be doing what they expected to do, or even wanted to do.

        If they don’t have any particular skill, they’ll probably end up being crop pickers or some shit because we really need those.