I apologize if this is old news, but I just noticed it. It looks like Kagi has added Fediverse Forums as a default Web search option.

  • Wolfram@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not using Kagi because its an American company is valid. But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product. There is still a transaction with a free product.

    Kagi is not free because they respect your privacy and don’t sell your data.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

      10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

      Like, that is way too much.

      I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

      • technopagan@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Have the same issue with them. I recently churned from Kagi after being a paying Pro customer. 10,-/month is simply too much. I’m paying for email (1,-/month) and web hosting (1,-/month) and web search should be in that price range to make it an attractive offer for people.

        I wrote to Kagi saying as much when I churned (also criticizing that most of their changelog messages are about LLM updates for “Ultimate” customers), but they responded saying that they believe in their offer and that the trajectory of new users signing up gives them confidence.

        I am, however, not willing to shell out Streaming Service level pricing (services that stream hundreds of GB to me every month) for some web searches.

        As much as it pains me due to Brave being involved in the whole crypto scam business and their CEO apparently being another a**hole tech fascist, I am using Brave Search for now. Its results were not inferior when I compared them to Kagi and I don’t need 95% of all the extra fluff that Kagi offers.

        As soon as there’s an offer for private search results with their own index that is not censored nor ad-driven, that company (maybe Kagi!) will have my money. But it needs to be commodity-priced like mail or hosting.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        $10/m is unlimited searches though…

        And yeah, searches are actually quite expensive. There’s a LOT of infrastructure that goes into making something unique with your own search engine that isn’t just a wrapper over Google.

        The actual compute cost per search, in 2024, was $0.0125. Kagi states they want to keep Costa below $0.015 per search, but their search partners are a major expense.

        That ofc ignores all the supporting infra, devs, support…etc that goes into making it all possible.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The business model just doesn’t make sense then (using search partners).

          Because $60, let alone $120 US, a year is far more than most people would be willing to pay.

          Dunno what to say, it’s just more than most people can justify paying for the service.

          I’m gonna stick with DuckDuckGo and the newly free mullvad cached search

      • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe. They use several other indexes as their backend so they have to pay microsoft for every search

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have donated €1500 to opensource software projects and paid a whopping €7 for software. These (privacy respecting) projects got my money because they weren’t transaction based. Capitalism is not the only way.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t use them or never read their privacy policy so i don’t know. But it’s not because it’s a paid service that company won’t use your data to sell it for more profit. That’s EXTRA profit for them, so why the hell not. And them being based in the US means I already can’t trust them with their poor privacy laws.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but they don’t (their privacy policy is exemplary). They have a whole shpiel about their business model. Just few weeks back they released a feature that makes it technically impossible for them to see who did searches, so no trust is needed anymore. They implemented a very novel protocol, quite cool.

        I have doubts considering they are an american company, but I want to see them succeed. Plus, they are remote, so at least a good chunk of the income taxes from salaries are going outside the US.

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a shame because there are good American businesses that are affected by this. There are companies that I respect. But it is what it is.

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, I agree. In general I will personally try to evaluate if the good that comes from a company succeeding outweighs the fact it’s a US company. I won’t use a dogmatic approach, but I will definitely be careful to choose even more carefully than before.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There are plenty of paid products that do not respect your privacy and sell your data.

      And there’s free products that do respect your privacy and don’t make you the product. They are community products.

      For instance I offer my bandwidth and storage to thousands of strangers to share torrents and they do the same to me. No secondhand transactions happening.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product.

      That’s definitely one model for operating a public service, but its far from the only one.