Thought this was interesting and worth knowing about

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    To quote this wiki that did a very good job of breaking down this clusterfuck:

    The CCPA defines “selling data” as:

    “Sell,” “selling,” “sale,” or “sold,” means selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by the business to a third party for monetary or other valuable consideration.

    The sticking point is that last “other valuable consideration.” The question that people should be asking is: “valuable to whom and in what capacity?” Value does not need to be for financial gain; knowledge is valuable to a contractor building a building, for example.

    But I recommend reading that wiki breakdown or just watch this video. It’s a mess that can’t be untangled in a simple Lemmy comment.

    • Colloidal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t want Mozilla to be handling my personal data in any way. Anonymized usage statistics? I could be convinced to relinquish that. But that’s it.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        From what I understand, usage stats are anonymized, and you can opt out of telemetry. But as I personally move to more hardened and private ways to connect, I’m moving to LibreWolf to err on the side of caution.

        It all feels like flying too close to the sun for my taste. I don’t like the idea of normalizing policies that aren’t cut and dry and easy to understand. Have a legal version and a version for dumb people like me if needed, but don’t expect me to play lawyer and connect the dots.