i love asoiaf but it’s hard to start rereading atm of course

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unsure about quaint but Discworld is absolutely pleasant and grows a delightful lore around itself. General advice is skip the first two (Pratchett was just figuring it out) and come back to them when you already love Rincewind.

    • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the first 2 and it’s where I started, I don’t see anything wrong with them and I will die on that hill.

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. The Colour of Magic is what got me into Discworld and I thoroughly enjoyed it as a standalone for a while.

      • alex [they, il]@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really don’t think they’re bad or even worse than the rest. I do feel like they’re so different from the other books that whether someone liked them or not doesn’t tell them if they’ll like the rest, which is the only reason I don’t recommend it as a taster before deciding on whether to read the other 30+ tomes.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair play! I don’t think they’re bad per se but I do think that the others are significantly better. I wouldn’t use the first two to demonstrate why Pratchett is one of the best things to happen to the English language since punctuation.

      • HipPriest@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll join you there - I loved Pratchett’s writing already from his Johnny series I read at school and read those first two all in one go during a summer holiday in my early teens. Great fantasy comedies.

        But - I can see the argument that they’re not representative of the series as a whole as it developed… not that I think Terry was probably setting out to write a massive series at the time he was writing those books. Anyway they’ll always have a place in my heart.

        However, it’s a series that ran for decades ago I compare it to something like Doctor Who on TV where people have favourite eras or favourite stories from different era’s, and those books are like the first few William Hartnell stories which are great but still have some moments that jar with what came later…

    • I tried reading Mort, but it’s very… dense. While I do enjoy the occasional book with flowery, descriptive language, I got a quarter of the way through it and no real plot happened.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To each their own!

        I find the overall plot is usually secondary to Pratchett using it as a means to talk about whatever. Or cracking absurdly good jokes. And while the plots can be good, Pratchett is really about the journey.

    • Cmot_Dibbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah friend, may i interest you in some nice meat pies? Currently two for the price of three. Black crunchy bits included.