My Thoughts on the Firefox situation
-
I’ve used Firefox since it was Mosaic, and when it was called Netscape Navigator.
-
I agree that the removal of the promise not to sell your data is bad, and the new EULA is bad.
-
I worry about the long term product development of Firefox
-
I question the role of the fork in development, meaning I don’t know how much they can do on their own without Firefox proper.
-
Firefox sync is an important feature to me. I’m open to self-hosting but not losing it.
-
I’m open to new browsers for the future, but this is a huge effort.
-
Brave is NOT the solution. No way, no how.
-
We need an alternative to Webkit based browsers.
-
Firefox will have lessons for us about FLOSS sustainability. We don’t know what those lessons are yet.
#Mozilla #Firefox
@calispera
I won’t speak for @terryb but there’s are two polarities. On one hand you have a singular vision, and on the other, a group.
There’s an expression in English “A camel is a horse designed by committee”.
There’s an idea that a thing made purely by focus groups will have no identity and no spirit.
Of course sometimes hearing the views of others will help inform and make a better work, but if it’s not done thoughtfully then you get “mush”.
Imagine if Leonardo da Vinci had a focus group. We’d have paintings of cats. :)
@serge@babka.social @calispera@babka.social @terryb@babka.social I mean that’s a good description of the pros and cons of singular (individual) vision versus groups. But I’m not sure you are going to get a lot of traction on this network running against the cat paintings. (Speaking of which, I wonder if @dailymedievalcats@troet.cafe is planning on cycling through their collection again. As I understand it, they’ve posted each of the paintings in their database once).
@serge@babka.social @calispera@babka.social And also, a focus group- unlike a committee - doesn’t even get to direct the discussion or make a final decision. Someone (or another group) listens and then decides what they really meant was…